My friend invited us to play basketball at his gym. I say: I'd come if I were there

  • Thread starter B45
  • Start date
  • Views : 2,043
Status
Not open for further replies.
B

B45

Guest
My friend invited us to play basketball at his gym. I say:

I'd come if I were there.

VS

I'd come if I was there.

And

I'd go if I were there.

VS

I'd go if I was there.

Are all four okay?
 
Last edited:

Roman55

Key Member
Joined
Feb 5, 2014
Member Type
Interested in Language
Native Language
British English
Home Country
Italy
Current Location
France
I am not a teacher.

None of these make sense to me.

If I understand you correctly, you have been invited to play basketball but you haven't gone yet. It is something that (if it happens at all) will take place in the future.

I would use "I'll" in this situation, making the appropriate changes to the rest of the sentences of course.
'I'll come if I can'.
'I'll come if I'm in town'.

"I'd" would be suitable if you already know that you aren't coming (or going) and want to explain why not.
'I'd love to, but I'll be out of town'.
'I'd come if I enjoyed basketball, but I don't so you won't be seeing me there'.
 
B

B45

Guest
Oh right, sorry, but I should've clarified that we're in different countries and he sent out a group chat via a mobile software.

My friend invited us to play basketball at his gym. I say:

I'd come if I were there.

VS

I'd come if I was there.

And

I'd go if I were there.

VS

I'd go if I was there.
 

bhaisahab

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Apr 12, 2008
Member Type
Retired English Teacher
Native Language
British English
Home Country
England
Current Location
Ireland
"I'd come if I were there."
 

MikeNewYork

VIP Member
Joined
Nov 13, 2002
Member Type
Academic
Native Language
American English
Home Country
United States
Current Location
United States
I prefer "I'll come if I am there."
 

bhaisahab

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Apr 12, 2008
Member Type
Retired English Teacher
Native Language
British English
Home Country
England
Current Location
Ireland

Tdol

No Longer With Us (RIP)
Staff member
Joined
Nov 13, 2002
Native Language
British English
Home Country
UK
Current Location
Japan
I'd come if I were there.

VS

I'd come if I was there.

And

I'd go if I were there.

VS

I'd go if I was there.

You will hear many native speakers use if I was there. However, were is the standard form and suitable for all occasions and contexts, while was would be considered inappropriate in formal contexts. Use were. You can use go/come.
 

Raymott

VIP Member
Joined
Jun 29, 2008
Member Type
Academic
Native Language
English
Home Country
Australia
Current Location
Australia
But wouldn't he know that, if you were there, you had come?
"I'd come if I were in X" would make more sense - (where X is where the basketball game is to be held.).
 

MikeNewYork

VIP Member
Joined
Nov 13, 2002
Member Type
Academic
Native Language
American English
Home Country
United States
Current Location
United States
Being in different countries does not preclude travel. If he is is not here, he will not come.
 

emsr2d2

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Jul 28, 2009
Member Type
English Teacher
Native Language
British English
Home Country
UK
Current Location
UK
If you definitely don't plan to go, you can say "Unfortunately, I can't come. I would come if I were going to be in the same country [as you] at the time".
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top