Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 11
  1. Masfer
    Guest
    #1

    Liaisons / "Linking" words

    Lately I have been paying attention to the way I pronounce the -ed part in the verbs when they're in past tense/participle. For example, I would say:

    - I switched on the TV, trying to put the stress in the ed part. Otherwise, I believe people don't realize I'm talking about the past :?

    - She sends it to me. Same problem here.

    When I try to emphasize these sounds I have to make a kind of little pause to separate the -ed/s word from the next one. This strange thing is avoided if I make a liaison between these word, that is:

    - I switchedon the TV
    - She sendsit to me.

    Actually I think this is what people do when speaking fast. Besides It sounds much more natural to me than the first one, though I think both ways are correct. Should I keep on doing these linking between words?

  2. RonBee's Avatar
    • Member Info
      • Member Type:
      • Other
      • Native Language:
      • American English
      • Home Country:
      • United States
      • Current Location:
      • United States

    • Join Date: Feb 2003
    • Posts: 16,570
    • Post Thanks / Like
    #2
    Do you mean say two words almost as if they are one, like sendzit?

    I do think that context generally indicates what tense is intended. (In AE, we turn on the TV.)

    :)

    • Member Info
      • Member Type:
      • English Teacher
      • Native Language:
      • British English
      • Home Country:
      • UK
      • Current Location:
      • Japan

    • Join Date: Nov 2002
    • Posts: 44,225
    • Post Thanks / Like
    #3
    It should really be 'swtichTon'.

  3. Masfer
    Guest
    #4
    Do you mean say two words almost as if they are one, like sendzit?
    Yes, I didn't realise that the sound was sendzit instead of sendsit. The same with switchTon

    Merry Xmas!

  4. RonBee's Avatar
    • Member Info
      • Member Type:
      • Other
      • Native Language:
      • American English
      • Home Country:
      • United States
      • Current Location:
      • United States

    • Join Date: Feb 2003
    • Posts: 16,570
    • Post Thanks / Like
    #5
    It's pretty common to run words together like that in speech. (Some call it connected speech..) An es at the end of a word often has a zee sound, as in bends, mends, and sends. And the next word is said as if it begins with the sound that the other word ends with. (There is another example: ends, said as endz.)

    :)

  5. Casiopea's Avatar

    • Join Date: Sep 2003
    • Posts: 12,970
    • Post Thanks / Like
    #6

    Re: Liaisons / "Linking" words

    There are two things going on here. First, the sound change is a natural process. It's called voicing assimilation:

    At the end of a word, a voiceless sound (e.g. p, t, s, k) become voiced (e.g. b, d, z, g) if it comes after a voiced sound, like this,

    /s/ => [z]
    sends => send[z]

    That pronunciation is English. It's the English "accent". Note, the pronunciation send[s] is not English, and, moreover, if pronounced that way it's a tell-tale sign that the speaker is not a native English speaker. That is, non-native speakers say send[s]it.

    At the end of a word, a voiced sound (e.g. b, d, z, g) become voicless (e.g. p, t, s, g) if it comes after a voiceless sound, like this,

    /d/ => [t]
    switched => switch[t]
    (the pronunication switch[d] is not English)

    Other examples include cats, dogs, roses.

    cats => cat[s]
    dogz => dog[z]
    roses => ros[Iz]

    Second, pronouncing two words as one, like this,

    sends it => sen[z]it
    switched on => switch[t]on

    is attributed to syllable structure contraints. CV(C) syllables are the more preferred in English. If there are too many Consonants or too few Consonants, the array of sounds is restructured, like this,

    Syllable Restructuring
    The sounds [z] is moved to word-initial position to form a CVC syllable:
    1. CVCCC+VC => CVCC+CVC

    EX: send[z] it => send+[z]it Syllable Restructuring

    Syllable Reduction
    "d" is deleted. It interferes with the speech flow.
    2. CVCC+CVC => CVC+CVC

    EX: send+[z]it => sen[z]it Syllable Reduction

    So, in the end, after voicing assimilation takes place and syllable structure contraints are satisfied, the string "sends it" is pronounced as sen[z]it, without [d]. That's the English "accent". The pronunciation send[z]it, with [d], is not English.

    :D

    One of my favorites is this,

    It's not is pronounced as It's [s]not.

    :D

  6. Masfer
    Guest
    #7

    re

    Great explanation !

    Happy new year ! ! Feliz año nuevo !

  7. Casiopea's Avatar

    • Join Date: Sep 2003
    • Posts: 12,970
    • Post Thanks / Like
    #8

    Re: re

    Quote Originally Posted by Masfer
    Great explanation !

    Happy new year ! ! Feliz año nuevo !
    You're welcome.

    Happy New Year! Akemashite Omedetou Gozaimusu!

    :D

    • Member Info
      • Member Type:
      • English Teacher
      • Native Language:
      • Lithuanian
      • Home Country:
      • Lithuania
      • Current Location:
      • Lithuania

    • Join Date: Aug 2005
    • Posts: 8
    • Post Thanks / Like
    #9

    Re: Liaisons / "Linking" words

    And what about "it's dark" or "it's zero"?. If I am right, we should say [its da:k],
    [its zie:reu].

    (P.S. According to the rules of Lithuanian (my native) assimilation, Lithuanians would like to say [itz da:k] or even [idz da:k] and [idziereu] or [iziereu]).
    Last edited by Aivaras; 05-Aug-2005 at 02:20.

  8. M56
    Guest
    #10

    Re: re

    Quote Originally Posted by Casiopea
    You're welcome.

    Happy New Year! Akemashite Omedetou Gozaimusu!

    :D
    This page is not too bad:

    http://www.englishclub.com/pronunciation/linking-2.htm

Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Native words
    By Anonymous in forum Ask a Teacher
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 27-Sep-2007, 02:22
  2. Slang words
    By hopechest in forum General Language Discussions
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 31-Jan-2007, 08:36
  3. 1000 most important words
    By Joe in forum Ask a Teacher
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 12-Sep-2004, 08:23
  4. Stingy with words + giveway
    By xanana in forum Ask a Teacher
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 11-Jan-2004, 15:05
  5. Confusing Words or Confused Words
    By Piak in forum General Language Discussions
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 08-Jun-2003, 00:10

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •