Results 1 to 7 of 7
    • Member Info
      • Member Type:
      • Academic
      • Native Language:
      • Armenian
      • Home Country:
      • Iran
      • Current Location:
      • United States

    • Join Date: Nov 2002
    • Posts: 1,997
    • Post Thanks / Like
    #1

    must have/ should have/ ought to have

    1-He must have gone there at three o'clock.
    2-He should have gone there at three o'clock.
    3-He ought to have gone there at three o'clock.

    Which of the above sentences:
    A-means that he had to go there at three o'clock but didn't
    B-means that he most probably/necessarily went there at three o'clock
    C-could mean both A and B depending on the context.

    • Member Info
      • Member Type:
      • English Teacher
      • Native Language:
      • British English
      • Home Country:
      • UK
      • Current Location:
      • Japan

    • Join Date: Nov 2002
    • Posts: 44,225
    • Post Thanks / Like
    #2
    A- 2\3
    B-1
    C- none

    • Member Info
      • Member Type:
      • Academic
      • Native Language:
      • Armenian
      • Home Country:
      • Iran
      • Current Location:
      • United States

    • Join Date: Nov 2002
    • Posts: 1,997
    • Post Thanks / Like
    #3
    Right.
    But consider:

    4-He should have arrived by now.
    5-He ought to have arrived by now.

    or even:

    6-He should have arrived. ("by now" implied)
    7-He ought to have arrived.

    Don't "should" and "ought to" imply liklihood in these cases, where "by now" is stated or implied?
    Aren't these sentences ambiguous?
    He should have arrived by now, but he hasn't.
    He should have arrived home by now. Give him a call.

  1. RonBee's Avatar
    • Member Info
      • Member Type:
      • Other
      • Native Language:
      • American English
      • Home Country:
      • United States
      • Current Location:
      • United States

    • Join Date: Feb 2003
    • Posts: 16,570
    • Post Thanks / Like
    #4
    Should have and ought to have are used pretty much the same way, especially in conditional sentences. (I think should have is used more often.

    I don't see any ambiguity in your sentences. They seem pretty clear to me.

    :)

    • Member Info
      • Member Type:
      • English Teacher
      • Native Language:
      • British English
      • Home Country:
      • UK
      • Current Location:
      • Japan

    • Join Date: Nov 2002
    • Posts: 44,225
    • Post Thanks / Like
    #5
    Quote Originally Posted by navi tasan
    Right.
    But consider:

    4-He should have arrived by now.
    5-He ought to have arrived by now.

    or even:

    6-He should have arrived. ("by now" implied)
    7-He ought to have arrived.

    Don't "should" and "ought to" imply liklihood in these cases, where "by now" is stated or implied?
    Aren't these sentences ambiguous?
    He should have arrived by now, but he hasn't.
    He should have arrived home by now. Give him a call.
    They're not ambiguous- but they do mean different things. They'd be clear in context.

    • Member Info
      • Member Type:
      • Academic
      • Native Language:
      • Armenian
      • Home Country:
      • Iran
      • Current Location:
      • United States

    • Join Date: Nov 2002
    • Posts: 1,997
    • Post Thanks / Like
    #6
    Thanks TDOL and RonBee.
    I think as usual I have managed to create a lot of confusion for myself.
    Let me reformulate my question:
    Is this correct:
    7-You should have finished your homework by now, but as usual, you have wasted a lot of time and have done very little work.

    • Member Info
      • Member Type:
      • English Teacher
      • Native Language:
      • British English
      • Home Country:
      • UK
      • Current Location:
      • Japan

    • Join Date: Nov 2002
    • Posts: 44,225
    • Post Thanks / Like
    #7
    That's correct.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •