Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: comma

  1. #1
    Anonymous Guest

    Default comma

    Are these sentences both correct:
    1-He was talking about Kennedy's assasination in 1963.
    2-He was talking about Kennedy's assasination, in 1963.
    I don't think one needs the comma, but I don't think using it there is wrong.

  2. #2
    RonBee's Avatar
    RonBee is offline Moderator
    • Member Info
      • Member Type:
      • Other
      • Native Language:
      • American English
      • Home Country:
      • United States
      • Current Location:
      • United States
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Posts
    16,570
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Your analysis is correct. (There is some ambiguity. Does the date indicate when it happened or when he was talking about it?)

    :)

  3. #3
    navi tasan is offline Key Member
    • Member Info
      • Member Type:
      • Academic
      • Native Language:
      • Armenian
      • Home Country:
      • Iran
      • Current Location:
      • United States
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Posts
    1,943
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Here, for once, I was paying attention to context! So I thought context would make it clear that the assasination took place in 63.

  4. #4
    RonBee's Avatar
    RonBee is offline Moderator
    • Member Info
      • Member Type:
      • Other
      • Native Language:
      • American English
      • Home Country:
      • United States
      • Current Location:
      • United States
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Posts
    16,570
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by navi tasan
    Here, for once, I was paying attention to context! So I thought context would make it clear that the assasination took place in 63.
    Well, it's a well-known event, so it would be well-understood that he was talking about the assassination of Kennedy in 1963. (Of course, the discussion could have also taken place in 1963.) I was, in this case, talking about general cases.

    Context is, in the case of a word, the surrounding words and in the case of a sentence the surrounding sentences. Context will usually help to dispel any ambiguity.

    There are levels of ambiguity. Sometimes reading a sentence will give a person one impression, but further reading will make him realize that his first impression was mistaken.

    Possible ambiguity in a sentence is not always a problem. It depends on whether context makes the meaning clear or does not. If you say "He was talking about it in 1968" the conversation seems to have taken place in 1968. If you say "He was talking about Dr. Martin Luther King's assassination in 1968" it seems that it was the event under discussion that took place in 1968. However, the conversation itself could have also taken place that year. If you say "Yesterday, he was talking about Dr. Martin Luther King's assassination in 1968" you have achieved greater clarity still. In any case, context would probably clear up any possible ambiguity.

    :)

  5. #5
    navi tasan is offline Key Member
    • Member Info
      • Member Type:
      • Academic
      • Native Language:
      • Armenian
      • Home Country:
      • Iran
      • Current Location:
      • United States
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Posts
    1,943
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Good analysis. Actually, I always try to avoid providing context in my questions because that way I can see how grammar functions. Ambiguity is generally swept aside by context. In real life, it almost never causes problems. But if one wants to know how gammar functions "on its own" so to speak, one has to go "beyond" context.
    Also, when it comes to translating, or even just understanding literature though, the situation changes. Ambiguity plays an important part in poetry.
    Consider also that I might be coming the other way. I am in a particular situation and want to know if a particular sentence could be used in that context. I know the sentence has meaning number 1, but can it be mean meaning number 2 as well? I have to know if the sentence can admit of two meanings (is ambiguous) or not. A native speaker of-course says the correct sentence without even thinking about it.
    Well, I hope I have made myself understood. I'll try to come up with some more ambiguous sentences!
    Thanks again.

  6. #6
    RonBee's Avatar
    RonBee is offline Moderator
    • Member Info
      • Member Type:
      • Other
      • Native Language:
      • American English
      • Home Country:
      • United States
      • Current Location:
      • United States
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Posts
    16,570
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    As usual, you did quite a good job of making yourself understood.

    :D

Similar Threads

  1. why a comma?
    By Taka in forum Ask a Teacher
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 21-Jul-2004, 05:33
  2. why is there no comma in the year?
    By Anonymous in forum Ask a Teacher
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 25-Feb-2004, 13:07
  3. Is it necessarily to put a comma before the word "too&q
    By Helped Wanted in forum Ask a Teacher
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 29-Nov-2003, 09:23
  4. Comma, article & new sentence
    By bmo in forum Ask a Teacher
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 29-Jul-2003, 22:09
  5. complex comma situations
    By mas94010 in forum General Language Discussions
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 03-May-2003, 21:34

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •