"I've been to" and "I've been in"

Status
Not open for further replies.

pedro8686

Junior Member
Joined
Mar 1, 2007
Member Type
Academic
Native Language
Polish
Home Country
Poland
Current Location
Poland
Could someone answer my question, please?

I read a thread about that issue, but I didn't find out the right answer.

What is the exact difference between:
1) I've been to London.
2) I've been in London.
3) Have you been to London?
4) Have you been in London?


Thank you
 

ian2

Member
Joined
Dec 22, 2006
Member Type
Other
Native Language
Chinese
Home Country
China
Current Location
United States
Could someone answer my question, please?

I read a thread about that issue, but I didn't find out the right answer.

What is the exact difference between:
1) I've been to London.
2) I've been in London.
3) Have you been to London?
4) Have you been in London?


Thank you

When I say "I have been to London", I mean I visited London before, but I don't have to be physically in London at the time when I say the sentence. But When I say "I have been in London for three days", I mean I am still in London.
 

ian2

Member
Joined
Dec 22, 2006
Member Type
Other
Native Language
Chinese
Home Country
China
Current Location
United States
It has been discussed before, I think. Try the search button.

Dear Humble:

following your instructions I searched the site and found the answers. But Tdol defines "To" as traveling and "IN" as location. Do you think my answer also makes some sense? If I am wrong, let me know. Thanks.

Ian2
 

Tdol

No Longer With Us (RIP)
Staff member
Joined
Nov 13, 2002
Native Language
British English
Home Country
UK
Current Location
Japan
Your answer makes sense to me. ;-)
 

pedro8686

Junior Member
Joined
Mar 1, 2007
Member Type
Academic
Native Language
Polish
Home Country
Poland
Current Location
Poland
So, when I say: "I've been to London for three days" that means I don't have to be there now (but I can) ?

I still don't know if I am right:
"to" - indicates that I am/was in a place because I am just travelling
"in" - indicates that I am in a place because I live there/I lived there before or I visited it, but now I am somewhere else

??

Could someone clarify it, please?
 

fiona bramble

Member
Joined
Mar 3, 2007
Member Type
English Teacher
So, when I say: "I've been to London for three days" that means I don't have to be there now (but I can) ?

I still don't know if I am right:
"to" - indicates that I am/was in a place because I am just travelling
"in" - indicates that I am in a place because I live there/I lived there before or I visited it, but now I am somewhere else

??

Could someone clarify it, please?


Whoa.......now I'm confused:-D
I think that "I've been to London" could mean [When I say "I have been to London", I mean I visited London before, but I don't have to be physically in London at the time when I say the sentence] but I have also heard people (especially in BE) say "I've been to London" as in "I just got back from London", which carries the same meaning as "I've been in London".

Here in Canada though, I would say that most people say "I've been to London", meaning "I have travelled to London" (unspecific time in the past or perhaps many times in the past) or "I've been in London", meaning "I have just been staying in London" (recent past)

Hope that doesn't make things more confusing!:-D
 

user_gary

Key Member
Joined
Jan 5, 2007
Member Type
Student or Learner
You are discussing about "have been to `some places'".
I wonder if we can use it to problems/situations. e.g. "I have been to that situation", "I have been in this problem for the first time".

Please help me.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top