Results 1 to 2 of 2
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    1,740
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default were beginning to shoot at jackals

    The sportsmen never saw a tiger, nor did they shoot anything else, though they saw number of deer, peacock, and wild board. They were giving up all hope of finding a tiger, and were beginning to shoot at jackals, when Grandfather, strolling down the forest path at some distance from the rest of the party, discovered a little tiger about eighteen inches long, hiding among the intricate roots of a banyan tre. Grandfather picked him up, and brought him home after the camp had broken up. He had the distinction of being the only member of the party to have bagged any game, dead or alive.


    Now, new doubt struck on my mind. In the first red line, the author says the hunters did not shoot anything but the violet line shows they did shoot jackal.

    So, I got confused.

    Could you help me?

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    101
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default Re: were beginning to shoot at jackals

    Hi,

    1. The prevalent tone in this section is irony. (Does the narrator really think of tourists with guns as "sportsmen"? Does he think of bagging the only tiger - a little one - as a "distinction"?)

    2. Notice that the authors uses "shoot" in two different ways:

    a) "shoot anything else": shoot + direct object
    b) "shooting at jackals": shoot + prepositional phrase

    The first usage means "to hunt with a gun". The second means "to aim and shoot in the direction of".

    Notice how the "sportsmen" (remember the irony) are not interested in deer, peacocks or boars. They want to shoot fierce beasts, like tigers. Jackals are predators, but they're not dangerous. "Shooting at jackals" is a sign of bored frustration. We don't know if anyone killed a jackal, but I doubt anyone took home the fur as a trophy.

    ***

    Summary: They wanted to shoot tigers, but didn't find any. Out of boredom they shot at jackels, but they probably didn't care if they hit them.

Similar Threads

  1. at the beginning vs. in the beginning
    By MiaL in forum Ask a Teacher
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 14-Oct-2009, 00:04
  2. Replies: 4
    Last Post: 12-Feb-2007, 06:35
  3. In the beginning VS AT the beginning
    By hela in forum Ask a Teacher
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 01-May-2006, 03:28
  4. at the beginning and in the beginning
    By jiang in forum Ask a Teacher
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 30-Nov-2005, 12:30
  5. (Ver 2) First, firstly, initially, start, beginning
    By Wai_Wai in forum Ask a Teacher
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 03-Oct-2004, 22:47

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •