Your text has made me wonder:
What about indivi-Duality versus Uni-quensess? If 'individual' literally means 'undivided', is it a duality that cannot be divided (maybe the troublesome coexistence of the self and otherness)? Is it then synonymous or rather antonymous with 'uniqueness' - which fuses us back into a unit.
Being an individual and being unique have different connotations to me. Being individual (one) in the context of many - versus being special or isolated from/un(l)ike the others.The duality in our individuality leaves us disassembled, but creativity fuses us back together as one. Isn't creativity then what definess uniqueness/originality in man? Or, as you put it, the singularity of the (indivi)duality? If so, what is it that defines individuality - what is the breach that divides us?
There is always a context (symbiosis?) for dualities. Love and hate coexist in the context of human emotions. Individuality and uniqueness must coexist as well - as separate entities in the context of ... (id)entity?