Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 11

Thread: have II

    • Member Info
      • Member Type:
      • Academic
      • Native Language:
      • Armenian
      • Home Country:
      • Iran
      • Current Location:
      • United States

    • Join Date: Nov 2002
    • Posts: 1,997
    • Post Thanks / Like
    #1

    have II

    Is this sentence correct:

    1-I'd hate to have our rivals win the match.

    I don't mean to say that I'll ask them to win or cause them to win. I mean to say that their winning will be something that I will undergo, something that'll happen to me. Like:
    2-I'd hate to see them win.

  1. Casiopea's Avatar

    • Join Date: Sep 2003
    • Posts: 12,970
    • Post Thanks / Like
    #2

    Re: have II

    Quote Originally Posted by navi tasan
    Is this sentence correct:

    1-I'd hate to have our rivals win the match.

    I don't mean to say that I'll ask them to win or cause them to win. I mean to say that their winning will be something that I will undergo, something that'll happen to me. Like:
    2-I'd hate to see them win.
    I would hate to see also means I would not want to see and I would not be happy if they won. :(

    • Member Info
      • Member Type:
      • Academic
      • Native Language:
      • Armenian
      • Home Country:
      • Iran
      • Current Location:
      • United States

    • Join Date: Nov 2002
    • Posts: 1,997
    • Post Thanks / Like
    #3
    Thanks Casiopea.
    "I would hate to see also means I would not want to see and I would not be happy if they won."

    But can't:
    1-I'd hate to have our rivals win the match.
    mean the same thing? "Have" not having a "causative" meaning (I learnt to use that word in this context from your other reply) here?

  2. RonBee's Avatar
    • Member Info
      • Member Type:
      • Other
      • Native Language:
      • American English
      • Home Country:
      • United States
      • Current Location:
      • United States

    • Join Date: Feb 2003
    • Posts: 16,570
    • Post Thanks / Like
    #4
    Certainly, you can have somebody do something, but that usage of have would not make sense in that context. Only Cas's definition makes sense to me.

    :)

    • Member Info
      • Member Type:
      • Academic
      • Native Language:
      • Armenian
      • Home Country:
      • Iran
      • Current Location:
      • United States

    • Join Date: Nov 2002
    • Posts: 1,997
    • Post Thanks / Like
    #5
    Thanks RonBee.
    Long time, no see.

    I thought "have +infinitive without to" could be used in two ways:
    a-ask, tell, order somebody to do something
    b-undergo something like "have something happen to one"
    I was trying to see if I could use it in this sense in that sentence.

    • Member Info
      • Member Type:
      • English Teacher
      • Native Language:
      • British English
      • Home Country:
      • UK
      • Current Location:
      • Japan

    • Join Date: Nov 2002
    • Posts: 44,225
    • Post Thanks / Like
    #6
    I think it means a bit of both- you'd see it happen and undergo it, wouldn't you?

  3. Casiopea's Avatar

    • Join Date: Sep 2003
    • Posts: 12,970
    • Post Thanks / Like
    #7
    Quote Originally Posted by navi tasan
    But can't:

    1-I'd hate to have our rivals win the match.

    mean the same thing? "Have" not having a "causative" meaning (I learnt to use that word in this context from your other reply) here?
    To me, 'to have' in

    I would hate to have them win

    means,

    I would hate it if it turned out that they won.

    As a spectator, I cannot cause my team to win.

    Try,

    The coach will have/make the team win.

    Compare,

    I would hate to make the win. (causative; "I" cause)
    I would hate to have them win. (non-causative; "I" don't cause)

    More like,

    I would hate to let them win. (non-causative; not within your power)
    I would hate to see them win.
    I would hat to have them win.

    :D

    • Member Info
      • Member Type:
      • Academic
      • Native Language:
      • Armenian
      • Home Country:
      • Iran
      • Current Location:
      • United States

    • Join Date: Nov 2002
    • Posts: 1,997
    • Post Thanks / Like
    #8
    Thanks TDOL, RonBee and specially Casiopea (your name is difficult to spell, but your explanation is excellent).

  4. RonBee's Avatar
    • Member Info
      • Member Type:
      • Other
      • Native Language:
      • American English
      • Home Country:
      • United States
      • Current Location:
      • United States

    • Join Date: Feb 2003
    • Posts: 16,570
    • Post Thanks / Like
    #9
    Quote Originally Posted by navi tasan
    Thanks RonBee.
    Long time, no see.

    I thought "have +infinitive without to" could be used in two ways:
    a-ask, tell, order somebody to do something
    b-undergo something like "have something happen to one"
    I was trying to see if I could use it in this sense in that sentence.
    Hey! A rhyme! :wink:

    Normally it works the way you suggest. Example: "I had Ron go to the store to get some groceries." But you wouldn't have your team win the game. That suggests that you asked them to win, which is unlikely. (They would try to win anyway, wouldn't they?) You could cheer them on, but that would, of course, be something different.

    :)

    • Member Info
      • Member Type:
      • Academic
      • Native Language:
      • Armenian
      • Home Country:
      • Iran
      • Current Location:
      • United States

    • Join Date: Nov 2002
    • Posts: 1,997
    • Post Thanks / Like
    #10
    Thanks RonBee.

    But a coach can have his team win, right? That is in Casiopea's reply and I don't think that means that the coach asks them to win. If I have understood Casiopea's meaning correctly, he causes them to win.
    I wonder if one could say:
    The coach got his team to win.

Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •