Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 1 2 3 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 29

    • Join Date: Apr 2004
    • Posts: 1,814
    • Post Thanks / Like
    #11
    So would it be OK if I replace 'how' with 'why'?


    Agreed. I would cry my eyes out. Haha


    • Join Date: May 2004
    • Posts: 727
    • Post Thanks / Like
    #12
    Quote Originally Posted by blacknomi
    So would it be OK if I replace 'how' with 'why'?


    Agreed. I would cry my eyes out. Haha
    In a way yes. I think how refers more to strategies, willpower, muscle, expertise ...


    • Join Date: Jul 2003
    • Posts: 508
    • Post Thanks / Like
    #13

    Re: What does 'how' mean?

    Quote Originally Posted by blacknomi
    In contrast, bronze medalists focus on how if they'd performed slightly worse, they wouldn't have won anything.

    If they had performed slightly worse, how would they have won anything?
    How? No way.

    If I had scored slightly lower in TOEFL, how would I have been accepted into Yale? How? No way. Yale wanted a high score.

  1. Casiopea's Avatar

    • Join Date: Sep 2003
    • Posts: 12,970
    • Post Thanks / Like
    #14
    Quote Originally Posted by blacknomi
    But research suggests athletes who win bronze medals are actually happier. This is because silver medalists think that if they'd performed slightly better, they might have won the gold medal. In contrast, bronze medalists focus on how if they'd performed slightly worse, they wouldn't have won anything.


    This is the whole context. I know the overall meaning but I don't really get the usage of 'how' here. Is it clearer now? :( :D
    Tough one! But I see it now. Thanx. :D

    In contrast, bronze medalists--if they had performed slightly worse-- focus on how (i.e., to what degree or extent) they wouldn't have won anything.

    All the best, :D


    • Join Date: Jul 2003
    • Posts: 508
    • Post Thanks / Like
    #15
    You are quite welcome.

    BMO

  2. Casiopea's Avatar

    • Join Date: Sep 2003
    • Posts: 12,970
    • Post Thanks / Like
    #16
    Quote Originally Posted by bmo
    You are quite welcome.

    BMO
    Sorry?


    • Join Date: Apr 2004
    • Posts: 1,814
    • Post Thanks / Like
    #17
    Quote Originally Posted by Casiopea
    Quote Originally Posted by bmo
    You are quite welcome.

    BMO
    Sorry?
    Maybe that's part of BMO's signature.


    • Join Date: Jul 2003
    • Posts: 508
    • Post Thanks / Like
    #18
    A mistake.

  3. Casiopea's Avatar

    • Join Date: Sep 2003
    • Posts: 12,970
    • Post Thanks / Like
    #19
    Quote Originally Posted by bmo
    A mistake.
    Oh. OK. I thought I had missed something or other. Sorry.

    Thanks, bmo.

    You are always of great help to me. :D

  4. Domaren
    Guest
    #20
    It looks like you people are tying yourselves up in knots over this.

    Firstly, by "period", I assume you mean "full stop". I am constantly dumbfounded as to why Americans felt the need to subsitute a perfectly clear word with only one clear meaning ("full stop") for one which shares its meaning with "a quantity of time", "era" and "menstuation".

    Enough on that subject, as catamenia is not required in the sentence and a full stop is only required at its end.

    To consider the use of the word "how", we might usefully consider the sentence with a substitute which conveys the same meaning:

    "In contrast, bronze medalists focus on the fact that if they'd performed slightly worse, they wouldn't have won anything."

    One focuses on a "thing". The thing upon which the bronze medalist is focusing on is how he could have lost, in the same way that a prisoner might ask, "how can I escape?" The way that he could have lost was by performing slightly worse.

    "if he had performed slightly worse" is not a thing and therefore it cannot be focused upon. Therefore, taking "how" away and leaving nothing in its place would remove the meaning of the sentence.

    If anything, "if he had performed slightly worse" could be left out could be left out without turning the sentence into nonsense because it is a secondary clause. To highlight its secondary nature and to clairfy meaning, I would suggest the use of commas as follows:

    "In contrast, bronze medalists focus on how, if they'd performed slightly worse, they wouldn't have won anything. "

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 1 2 3 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •