Page 3 of 5 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5 LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 45

Thread: question

    • Member Info
      • Member Type:
      • Other
      • Native Language:
      • Japanese
      • Home Country:
      • Japan
      • Current Location:
      • Japan

    • Join Date: Mar 2004
    • Posts: 1,074
    • Post Thanks / Like
    #21
    Quote Originally Posted by tdol
    I'd say "A1, A2 and other things that do as A" would be context driven. In the context, say, of the animals in Africa, then I'd say you are right, but in the context of the beach example, I'd say things are less clearcut. Language doesn't always have mathematical precision, IMO.
    But isn't it weird if the restrictive relative pronoun modified "rugs, towels, baskets"? In fact, you said:

    Quote Originally Posted by tdol
    This makes more sense to me:
    Arriving at the beach, people stake out a small territorial claim, marking it with rugs, towels, baskets and other belongings, to which they can return from their seaboard wanderings.

    Doesn't that fit better?
    I don't see any reason to restrict, identify, or differentiate those items, do you?

    • Member Info
      • Member Type:
      • English Teacher
      • Native Language:
      • British English
      • Home Country:
      • UK
      • Current Location:
      • Japan

    • Join Date: Nov 2002
    • Posts: 47,017
    • Post Thanks / Like
    #22
    But isn't it weird if the restrictive relative pronoun modified "rugs, towels, baskets?

    Not to me.

    • Member Info
      • Member Type:
      • Other
      • Native Language:
      • Japanese
      • Home Country:
      • Japan
      • Current Location:
      • Japan

    • Join Date: Mar 2004
    • Posts: 1,074
    • Post Thanks / Like
    #23
    Quote Originally Posted by tdol
    Not to me.
    Why not?? You have to know which kind of rugs, towels, baskets are meant? Classifying those items?

    • Member Info
      • Member Type:
      • English Teacher
      • Native Language:
      • British English
      • Home Country:
      • UK
      • Current Location:
      • Japan

    • Join Date: Nov 2002
    • Posts: 47,017
    • Post Thanks / Like
    #24
    I just don't see the need to get the scalpel out and cur the other objects away so precisely as this- I see the sentence as muddier than you.

    • Member Info
      • Member Type:
      • Other
      • Native Language:
      • Japanese
      • Home Country:
      • Japan
      • Current Location:
      • Japan

    • Join Date: Mar 2004
    • Posts: 1,074
    • Post Thanks / Like
    #25
    OK. So let me ask this question this way:

    Which interpretation is contextually more natural?

    (a) which=other belongings
    (b) which=rugs, towels, baskets and other belongings

    If (b), why?


    -------
    By the way, I don't understand this part of your comments:

    Quote Originally Posted by tdol
    I just don't see the need to get the scalpel out and cur the other objects away so precisely as this- I see the sentence as muddier than you.

    • Member Info
      • Member Type:
      • English Teacher
      • Native Language:
      • British English
      • Home Country:
      • UK
      • Current Location:
      • Japan

    • Join Date: Nov 2002
    • Posts: 47,017
    • Post Thanks / Like
    #26
    Cut

    • Member Info
      • Member Type:
      • Other
      • Native Language:
      • Japanese
      • Home Country:
      • Japan
      • Current Location:
      • Japan

    • Join Date: Mar 2004
    • Posts: 1,074
    • Post Thanks / Like
    #27
    Quote Originally Posted by tdol
    Cut
    I see.

    tdol, tell me something. Why do you think in "Giraffes, lions and other animals that inhabit Africa", the relative pronoun refers only to "other animals", whereas in "rugs, towels, baskets and other belongings to which they can return...", things are less clear-cut?

    • Member Info
      • Member Type:
      • English Teacher
      • Native Language:
      • British English
      • Home Country:
      • UK
      • Current Location:
      • Japan

    • Join Date: Nov 2002
    • Posts: 47,017
    • Post Thanks / Like
    #28
    We can assume that most know that giraffes live in Africa, but the main function of a rug is not to serve as a marker on a beach, but to sit on, yet they serve as markers when returning.

    • Member Info
      • Member Type:
      • Other
      • Native Language:
      • Japanese
      • Home Country:
      • Japan
      • Current Location:
      • Japan

    • Join Date: Mar 2004
    • Posts: 1,074
    • Post Thanks / Like
    #29
    Quote Originally Posted by tdol
    but the main function of a rug is not to serve as a marker on a beach
    But contextually, isn't it clear that the main function of a rug is to serve as a marker on a beach?

    • Member Info
      • Member Type:
      • Other
      • Native Language:
      • Japanese
      • Home Country:
      • Japan
      • Current Location:
      • Japan

    • Join Date: Mar 2004
    • Posts: 1,074
    • Post Thanks / Like
    #30
    tdol?

Page 3 of 5 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Problem with posting a question
    By jiang in forum Support Area
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 10-Oct-2004, 15:45
  2. Tag question
    By Anonymous in forum Ask a Teacher
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 17-Jun-2004, 10:11
  3. Ambiguous Question Interpretation
    By Anonymous in forum Ask a Teacher
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 23-Apr-2004, 23:47
  4. question
    By Anonymous in forum Ask a Teacher
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 24-Feb-2004, 13:56
  5. Question about -ed phrases
    By Astro-D in forum Ask a Teacher
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 26-Mar-2003, 19:13

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •