Page 1 of 4 1234 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 34
  1. #1
    Mark77 is offline Newbie
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    4
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default 'More strict' vs 'stricter'

    Hey,

    I have surfed a bit and I know that 'stricter' is preferred but is it all right to use 'more strict'?

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    420
    Post Thanks / Like

    Smile Re: 'More strict' vs 'stricter'

    Simply, 'no'. Stricter is the correct superlative.

  3. #3
    susiedqq is offline Key Member
    • Member Info
      • Member Type:
      • Academic
      • Native Language:
      • English
      • Home Country:
      • United States
      • Current Location:
      • United States
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    2,944
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default Re: 'More strict' vs 'stricter'

    I don't think there is such a word as "stricter"

    The rules are strict.
    The writing rules are more strict.
    The speaking rules are the most strict.


    There is the noun form: strickness and the adverbial form strictly.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    420
    Post Thanks / Like

    Smile Re: 'More strict' vs 'stricter'

    Susie, perhaps another US/UK difference?: this from the BBC website today -

    BBC NEWS | Europe | Euro MPs back stricter gun laws

  5. #5
    susiedqq is offline Key Member
    • Member Info
      • Member Type:
      • Academic
      • Native Language:
      • English
      • Home Country:
      • United States
      • Current Location:
      • United States
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    2,944
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default Re: 'More strict' vs 'stricter'

    Yes, you are correct. I just don't like it

    Stricter and strickest can be used.

    (I'll have my Crow BBQ'ed please)

  6. #6
    Mark77 is offline Newbie
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    4
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default Re: 'More strict' vs 'stricter'

    Ok, I'm still a bit confused but thanks a lot anyway. I think it's safer to use 'stricter'. Cambridge Online Dictionaries seems to think so, too.

    I'm studying English and having a hard time with stuff like that. Did I just use 'stuff' on a language forum?

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    420
    Post Thanks / Like

    Smile Re: 'More strict' vs 'stricter'

    Mark, 'stuff' in the context you used it just then was coined in 1580...don't sweat about it!!!

  8. #8
    Deepurple is offline Member
    • Member Info
      • Member Type:
      • Interested in Language
      • Native Language:
      • Chinese
      • Home Country:
      • Hong Kong
      • Current Location:
      • Hong Kong
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    458
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default Re: 'More strict' vs 'stricter'

    IMHO, both are acceptable.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    36
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default Re: 'More strict' vs 'stricter'


  10. #10
    Roman 36 is offline Newbie
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    1
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default Re: 'More strict' vs 'stricter'

    Hi

    I heard "more strict" the other day and it sounded a little odd.

    The rule goes that if you have a single syllable adjective, then add "er".

    As "strict" fits that description, I'd go with "stricter". That, of course, is not to say that in some parts of the US, Canada, or even the UK, "more strict" is being used and considered "natural".

Page 1 of 4 1234 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. one who stays strict, superstitious....
    By Ju in forum Ask a Teacher
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 05-Feb-2008, 04:56
  2. Replies: 1
    Last Post: 03-Feb-2008, 08:15
  3. strict phrases make english dificult to speak
    By sardar in forum Ask a Teacher
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 23-Jul-2006, 11:12

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Hotchalk