Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 12
  1. #1
    Bushwhacker's Avatar
    Bushwhacker is offline Senior Member
    • Member Info
      • Member Type:
      • Student or Learner
      • Native Language:
      • Catalan
      • Home Country:
      • Spain
      • Current Location:
      • Spain
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    1,040
    Post Thanks / Like

    Cool A short feature in length

    What's the meaning, when talking on cinema, of a short feature in length. It seems it is referring to a short but the movie they are talking about is a classic doc, Drifters, by Grierson, and it is round 45 minutes long, so wouldn't we say it is rather a medium-length film?

    Thanks

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    5,425
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: A short feature in length

    Formerly, the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences, the American Film Institute, and the British Film Institute all defined a feature as a film with a running time of 40 minutes or longer. This has long been changed, so that a feature now runs 90+ minutes.
    To differentiate such short and long features, they are now referred to as a full-feature film and short feature film.
    Last edited by David L.; 09-Apr-2008 at 16:03.

  3. #3
    heidita's Avatar
    heidita is offline Senior Member
    • Member Info
      • Member Type:
      • English Teacher
      • Native Language:
      • Spanish
      • Home Country:
      • Europe
      • Current Location:
      • Europe
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    1,436
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: A short feature in length

    I think for a movie this can certainly be considered rather short. I had to check, It seems to last one hour, that's what they say here, anyway. but even one hour would be short in my opinion.

  4. #4
    heidita's Avatar
    heidita is offline Senior Member
    • Member Info
      • Member Type:
      • English Teacher
      • Native Language:
      • Spanish
      • Home Country:
      • Europe
      • Current Location:
      • Europe
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    1,436
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: A short feature in length

    Very interesting, David!!

  5. #5
    Bushwhacker's Avatar
    Bushwhacker is offline Senior Member
    • Member Info
      • Member Type:
      • Student or Learner
      • Native Language:
      • Catalan
      • Home Country:
      • Spain
      • Current Location:
      • Spain
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    1,040
    Post Thanks / Like

    Cool Re: A short feature in length

    Quote Originally Posted by David L. View Post
    Formerly, the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences, the American Film Institute, and the British Film Institute all defined a feature as a film with a running time of 40 minutes or longer. This has long been changed, so that a feature now runs 90+ minutes.
    To differentiate such short and long features, they are now referred to a a full-feature film and short feature film.
    Yes, Thank You, but then, what is it understood by a short feature in lenght? Just a short? My problem, here, is this in lenght, which seems to be referring to the movie running time, isn't it?

    Thanks again

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    5,425
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: A short feature in length

    Re-read my post:

    To differentiate such short and long features, they are now referred to as a full-feature film and short feature film.

    How long is the movie Drifters? - 45 mins.
    How long is a feature? - 90+ minutes
    Hence, a feature film with a running time less than 90 minutes is a short feature in length - a short feature so classified because of its short length.
    A short would be a documentary, or an animated cartoon which (in the cinema) are usually far less than 90 minutes.
    However, Disney might release an animated movie of some fairy tale as a 'feature'. It is not a cartoon, but because it lasts 70 minutes, would be classified as a short feature.
    Last edited by David L.; 09-Apr-2008 at 16:04.

  7. #7
    Bushwhacker's Avatar
    Bushwhacker is offline Senior Member
    • Member Info
      • Member Type:
      • Student or Learner
      • Native Language:
      • Catalan
      • Home Country:
      • Spain
      • Current Location:
      • Spain
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    1,040
    Post Thanks / Like

    Cool Re: A short feature in length

    Quote Originally Posted by David L. View Post
    Re-read my post:

    To differentiate such short and long features, they are now referred to as a full-feature film and short feature film.

    How long is the movie Drifters? - 45 mins.
    How long is a feature? - 90+ minutes
    Hence, a feature film with a running time less than 90 minutes is a short feature in length - a short feature so classified because of its short length.
    A short would be a documentary, or an animated cartoon which (in the cinema) are usually far less than 90 minutes.
    However, Disney might release an animated movie of some fairy tale as a 'feature'. It is not a cartoon, but because it lasts 70 minutes, would be classified as a short feature.
    Yes, yes, I've understood your first answer very well. The problem is that here, in Catalonia, there is still a difference between a short, medium or full-length movie, and a movie 30 minutes in length is already a medium-length movie. But, ok; all your information is quite useful. Thank You

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    5,425
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: A short feature in length

    You flabbergast me.
    Somebody else will tell you what it means.

  9. #9
    Bushwhacker's Avatar
    Bushwhacker is offline Senior Member
    • Member Info
      • Member Type:
      • Student or Learner
      • Native Language:
      • Catalan
      • Home Country:
      • Spain
      • Current Location:
      • Spain
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    1,040
    Post Thanks / Like

    Cool Re: A short feature in length

    Quote Originally Posted by David L. View Post
    You flabbergast me.
    Somebody else will tell you what it means.
    Not required. All is clear. Terribly sorry. My problem was in the meaning of "in length" but while talking about the length of the movies all has become clear. The blend of all subjects has possibly caused this blurred situation I didn't intend at all.

    Excuse me and thank you

  10. #10
    heidita's Avatar
    heidita is offline Senior Member
    • Member Info
      • Member Type:
      • English Teacher
      • Native Language:
      • Spanish
      • Home Country:
      • Europe
      • Current Location:
      • Europe
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    1,436
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: A short feature in length

    Quote Originally Posted by David L. View Post
    You flabbergast me.
    .
    I simply love the word flabbergast!

Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. small built, a little short of pretty
    By KLPNO in forum Ask a Teacher
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 15-Jan-2008, 23:18
  2. be short of/lack
    By thru in forum Ask a Teacher
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 21-Feb-2007, 21:16
  3. fall short of
    By Korusan in forum Ask a Teacher
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 14-Dec-2006, 06:04

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •