Page 4 of 8 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 LastLast
Results 31 to 40 of 71

Thread: Have had


    • Join Date: Apr 2004
    • Posts: 1,344
    • Post Thanks / Like
    #31
    Can you tell me what the other ones mean so I can understand why is it wrong. Thanks.

    1. You need to watch what you have said.
    2. You need to watch what you had said.
    3. You need to watch what you said.

    • Member Info
      • Member Type:
      • English Teacher
      • Native Language:
      • British English
      • Home Country:
      • UK
      • Current Location:
      • Japan

    • Join Date: Nov 2002
    • Posts: 44,225
    • Post Thanks / Like
    #32
    It's a bit late to be giving advice like this- it has to be given before the event, not after. Afterwards, say 'you shouldn't have said that'.

  1. Casiopea's Avatar

    • Join Date: Sep 2003
    • Posts: 12,970
    • Post Thanks / Like
    #33
    Quote Originally Posted by jack
    Can you tell me what the other ones mean so I can understand why is it wrong. Thanks.

    1. You need to watch what you have said.
    2. You need to watch what you had said.
    3. You need to watch what you said.
    'need to' is a modal; it means, it's necessary that you do something, you are obligated to do something. 'necessary' and 'obligated' make reference to the Present and the Future, not the Past.


    • Join Date: Apr 2004
    • Posts: 1,344
    • Post Thanks / Like
    #34
    Thank you very much.

  2. Casiopea's Avatar

    • Join Date: Sep 2003
    • Posts: 12,970
    • Post Thanks / Like
    #35
    Quote Originally Posted by jack
    Thank you very much.
    You're welcome.


    • Join Date: Apr 2004
    • Posts: 1,344
    • Post Thanks / Like
    #36
    Scenario:

    We're talking about something in the past and she always gets her way and stuff and I said to the other person:

    Do I reply back with:
    1. I just let her had it.
    2. I just let her have it.

    Which one do I use? I think #2 is correct, but why 'have' and not 'had'?

    • Member Info
      • Member Type:
      • English Teacher
      • Native Language:
      • British English
      • Home Country:
      • UK
      • Current Location:
      • Japan

    • Join Date: Nov 2002
    • Posts: 44,225
    • Post Thanks / Like
    #37
    #2 is correct- it's an infinitive without 'to' and doesn't show tense.


    • Join Date: Apr 2004
    • Posts: 1,344
    • Post Thanks / Like
    #38
    Quote Originally Posted by tdol
    #2 is correct- it's an infinitive without 'to' and doesn't show tense.
    So #1 is incorrect? #2, How do I know that it's an infinitive without 'to'? How can I test this? What are some words that I can add in to test it?

  3. Casiopea's Avatar

    • Join Date: Sep 2003
    • Posts: 12,970
    • Post Thanks / Like
    #39
    Quote Originally Posted by jack
    How can I test this?
    I just let them have it. (OK)

    Note that, 'have' is a verb and 'let' is a verb. Within a single sentence, such as the one above, there can only be one main verb (i.e., only one tense-carrying verb).

    I just let them had it. (Not OK)

    Both 'let' and 'had' carry tense. 'let' carries tense and 'had' carries tense.


    • Join Date: Apr 2004
    • Posts: 1,344
    • Post Thanks / Like
    #40
    Got it, thanks.

Page 4 of 8 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •