Results 1 to 2 of 2

Thread: argumentation

  1. #1
    navi tasan is offline Key Member
    • Member Info
      • Member Type:
      • Academic
      • Native Language:
      • Armenian
      • Home Country:
      • Iran
      • Current Location:
      • United States
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Posts
    1,989
    Post Thanks / Like

    argumentation

    Which is correct:
    1-Argumentation by Keith is always rational.
    2-Keith's argumentation is always rational.

    3-There is a weakness in argumentation by Keith.
    4-There is a weakness in the argumentation by Keith.
    5-There is a weakness in Keith's argumentation.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Posts
    12,970
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: argumentation

    Quote Originally Posted by navi tasan
    Which is correct:
    1-Argumentation by Keith is always rational.
    2-Keith's argumentation is always rational.

    3-There is a weakness in argumentation by Keith.
    4-There is a weakness in the argumentation by Keith.
    5-There is a weakness in Keith's argumentation.
    2- and 5-. :wink:

    Note, Keith's style of argumentation.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •