Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 16

Thread: trace

    • Member Info
      • Member Type:
      • Other
      • Native Language:
      • Japanese
      • Home Country:
      • Japan
      • Current Location:
      • Japan

    • Join Date: Mar 2004
    • Posts: 1,074
    • Post Thanks / Like
    #1

    trace

    The sentence:

    The cell becomes two, then four, and so on, and after a while the last trace is gone.

    What exactly does "the last trace" mean? Why not just "the trace" but "the last trace"??

  1. Casiopea's Avatar

    • Join Date: Sep 2003
    • Posts: 12,970
    • Post Thanks / Like
    #2

    Re: trace

    Quote Originally Posted by Taka
    The sentence:

    The cell becomes two, then four, and so on, and after a while the last trace is gone.

    What exactly does "the last trace" mean? Why not just "the trace" but "the last trace"??
    Biology
    The cell divided into two cells, then it divides into four cells, and so on, after a while the last trace element of the original cell is gone. :D

    • Member Info
      • Member Type:
      • Other
      • Native Language:
      • Japanese
      • Home Country:
      • Japan
      • Current Location:
      • Japan

    • Join Date: Mar 2004
    • Posts: 1,074
    • Post Thanks / Like
    #3

    Re: trace

    Ah! I thought that should be the first trace. So I counted down...

  2. Casiopea's Avatar

    • Join Date: Sep 2003
    • Posts: 12,970
    • Post Thanks / Like
    #4

    Re: trace

    Quote Originally Posted by Taka
    Ah! I thought that should be the first trace. So I counted down...
    Wow. I see what you mean. Cool! :D 8)

    • Member Info
      • Member Type:
      • Other
      • Native Language:
      • Japanese
      • Home Country:
      • Japan
      • Current Location:
      • Japan

    • Join Date: Mar 2004
    • Posts: 1,074
    • Post Thanks / Like
    #5

    Re: trace

    But wrong, huh?

  3. Mister Micawber's Avatar
    • Member Info
      • Member Type:
      • English Teacher
      • Native Language:
      • English
      • Home Country:
      • United States
      • Current Location:
      • Japan

    • Join Date: Sep 2004
    • Posts: 1,855
    • Post Thanks / Like
    #6
    Actually, it's a little strange, Taka-- could you check the source and tell me 'the last trace of what'?

  4. Casiopea's Avatar

    • Join Date: Sep 2003
    • Posts: 12,970
    • Post Thanks / Like
    #7

    Re: trace

    Quote Originally Posted by Taka
    But wrong, huh?
    Yes and No. "No" in that trace means, trace element (i.e., the trace element has been redistributed to the point that is it no longer quantifiable) and, "Yes", because Quantum mechanics would have a thing or two to say about how to quantify such things. :D

    • Member Info
      • Member Type:
      • Other
      • Native Language:
      • Japanese
      • Home Country:
      • Japan
      • Current Location:
      • Japan

    • Join Date: Mar 2004
    • Posts: 1,074
    • Post Thanks / Like
    #8
    Quote Originally Posted by Mister Micawber
    Actually, it's a little strange, Taka-- could you check the source and tell me 'the last trace of what'?
    It's Lewis Thomas' essay "Death in the Open," a section of his now famous book, Lives of a Cell.

    http://empirezine.com/newwave/1.htm

  5. Mister Micawber's Avatar
    • Member Info
      • Member Type:
      • English Teacher
      • Native Language:
      • English
      • Home Country:
      • United States
      • Current Location:
      • Japan

    • Join Date: Sep 2004
    • Posts: 1,855
    • Post Thanks / Like
    #9
    Quote Originally Posted by Lewis Thomas
    ...there are some creatures that do not seem to die at all; they simply vanish into their own progeny. single cells do this. the cell becomes two, then four, and so on, and after a while the last trace is gone. it cannot be see[n] as death; barring mutation, the descendants are simply the first cell, living all over again.
    Thanks, Taka-- so, a 'trace' is 'a slight evidence' of the original cell, and the 'last trace' is just that: the final evidence of the original cell (as an entity) disappears eventually, down the generations.

  6. Casiopea's Avatar

    • Join Date: Sep 2003
    • Posts: 12,970
    • Post Thanks / Like
    #10
    Quote Originally Posted by Mister Micawber
    Quote Originally Posted by Lewis Thomas
    ...there are some creatures that do not seem to die at all; they simply vanish into their own progeny. single cells do this. the cell becomes two, then four, and so on, and after a while the last trace is gone. it cannot be see[n] as death; barring mutation, the descendants are simply the first cell, living all over again.
    Thanks, Taka-- so, a 'trace' is 'a slight evidence' of the original cell, and the 'last trace' is just that: the final evidence of the original cell (as an entity) disappears eventually, down the generations.
    I couldn't have said it better myself. Hey, wait a minute! I did:

    Quote Originally Posted by Casiopea
    Biology
    The cell divided into two cells, then it divides into four cells, and so on, after a while the last trace element of the original cell is gone.

Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. What is this, grammatically?
    By Taka in forum Ask a Teacher
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 20-Apr-2004, 12:24

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •