Results 1 to 3 of 3
  1. #1
    sara88 is offline Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    461
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default why the use of simple past??!!

    Hello all
    I was reading a book and this sentence brought my attention. I was wandering why does the writer uses the simple past as the past continious seems the correct one for me. See if I'm wrong!!:
    "I had never read anything as disturbing as these ten verses. I could not stop thinking about them day and night, when I ate, when I walked to and from work, when I sat alone, when I whatched tv, when I lay in bed......"
    Why not was eating, was walking, was watching.....because it conveys a past continious action.
    Clarify it for me please.
    sara

  2. #2
    bhaisahab's Avatar
    bhaisahab is offline Moderator
    • Member Info
      • Member Type:
      • Retired English Teacher
      • Native Language:
      • British English
      • Home Country:
      • England
      • Current Location:
      • England
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    22,318
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default Re: why the use of simple past??!!

    Quote Originally Posted by sara88 View Post
    Hello all
    I was reading a book and this sentence brought my attention. I was wandering why does the writer uses the simple past as the past continious seems the correct one for me. See if I'm wrong!!:
    "I had never read anything as disturbing as these ten verses. I could not stop thinking about them day and night, when I ate, when I walked to and from work, when I sat alone, when I whatched tv, when I lay in bed......"
    Why not was eating, was walking, was watching.....because it conveys a past continious action.
    Clarify it for me please.
    sara
    Personally, I agree with you, it would be better if it had stayed in the past simple, but authors write what they want to write.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    5,425
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    The author is saying, it doesn't matter whether you ask me after the first bite of my food, or any time during the period of time implied by 'was eating' - I'd be thinking about the scenes right until the last bite; and then I might walk...and still be thinking about them. The time period, the duration of any activity, is immaterial: I eat, I think about them. I walk, I think about them.

    The style of writing is of a montage, snapshots, an instance of each of these activities to portray 'he's still thinking about them'. To use a continuous tense would destroy the dramatic effect of the prose - it's like a drum beat: I eat - boom - I think about them -boom - I walk - boom - I think about them.
    Last edited by David L.; 26-Jun-2008 at 23:16.

Similar Threads

  1. Is Yesterday a past time?
    By shun in forum General Language Discussions
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 13-Feb-2008, 18:54
  2. simple past - past perfect continuous interrogativedifferences
    By Unregistered9996 in forum Ask a Teacher
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 26-Dec-2007, 03:05
  3. A strange use of tense
    By shun in forum Linguistics
    Replies: 26
    Last Post: 18-Sep-2006, 02:45
  4. Simple past versus past perfect or pluperfect
    By chrisalor in forum Ask a Teacher
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 05-Sep-2006, 20:59
  5. Simple Past - questionnaire for teachers
    By Renatask in forum Teaching English
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 27-Aug-2006, 12:24

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •