Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 1 2
Results 11 to 12 of 12
  1. #11
    Soup's Avatar
    Soup is offline VIP Member
    • Member Info
      • Member Type:
      • English Teacher
      • Native Language:
      • English
      • Home Country:
      • Canada
      • Current Location:
      • China
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    5,892
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default Re: difference between these two sentences

    To me, both 1. and 2. admit the same unmarked meaning.
    1. I miss this: being with my friends.
    2. I miss this: not being with my friends.
    That is, miss not being and miss being can and, indeed, do express the same meaning.

    Sentence 2., however, can carry an additional meaning (as David points out): the opposite of its literal meaning, and the opposite of what the person intended:
    2. I miss not being with my friends.
    a. I don't miss being with my friends.
    b. I don't miss not being with my friends.
    In this case, sentence 2. would be deemed ungrammatical on the basis that it expresses the opposite (meaning) of what the person intended. However, if the person's intention is to express irony or sarcasm, then both a. and b. would be deemed acceptable marked/forced readings, and, moreover, to add to the semantic tangle, b. could be
    deemed unacceptable given its (apparent) double negative: sentence 2b. could be argued to have an additional meaning, sentence 1.

    The problem, or rather the psycholinguistic puzzle we are dealing with, which is related to less in could care less vs couldn't care less, both of which mean don't care, is that the implicit negation in some words, like less and miss make their semantics difficult to untangle.
    This explains why the errors [i.e., saying the opposite of what one means; e.g., sentence 2] are not detected and corrected: we accept an interpretation that is a priori the plausible one, even though it's incompatible with the sentence as written or spoken, because it's too hard to work out the semantic details.

    Examples
    "That'll teach you (not) to tease the alligators."
    "No head injury is too trivial to ignore."
    "Do not fail to avoid neglecting this post."

    Read more here Language Log: Why are negations so easy to fail to miss?

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    40
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default Re: difference between these two sentences

    what's the confusion? It's very simple - the two sentences expresse opposite meanings.

    The first sentence - the speaker misses being with her friends

    she is sorry she is not with her friends

    The second sentence - the speaker misses not being with her friends, in other words, she misses being away from her friends.

    she is sorry she is with her friends

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 1 2

Similar Threads

  1. Is there a difference between these two sentences?
    By XINLAI-UE in forum Ask a Teacher
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 23-Jun-2008, 07:46
  2. Difference in meaning between sentences
    By kohyoongliat in forum Ask a Teacher
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 13-Jun-2007, 01:21
  3. the slight difference between two sentences.
    By dragontiger in forum Ask a Teacher
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 17-Jan-2006, 00:59
  4. Replies: 3
    Last Post: 09-Dec-2005, 22:25
  5. difference between two sentences
    By terry in forum Ask a Teacher
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 19-Nov-2005, 07:30

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •