"After", a conjunction or an adverb

  • Thread starter spot
  • Start date
  • Views : 55,704
Status
Not open for further replies.
S

spot

Guest
In the following sentence "After killing the goose, the farmer gasped." Is "after" a subordinating conjunction or an adverb? If it is a subordinating conjunction and not an adverb, how do you explain and convince somebody who believes it is an adverb? Thank you.
 

Casiopea

VIP Member
Joined
Sep 21, 2003
Member Type
Other
spot said:
In the following sentence "After killing the goose, the farmer gasped." Is "after" a subordinating conjunction or an adverb? If it is a subordinating conjunction and not an adverb, how do you explain and convince somebody who believes it is an adverb? Thank you.
A subordinating conjunction introduced a clause. (Please note, a clause has tense)

Conjunction: The farmer gasped after he had killed the goose.

'after', a subordinating conjunction, introduces the clause 'he had killed the goose'; note, 'had killed' carries tense.

If 'after' doesn't introduce a clause, then it's not a conjunction:

Preposition: After killing the goose, the farmer gasped.

'after', a preposition in form, heads the adverbial phrase 'After killing the goose'; note, 'killing' is not a verb.

Both the phrase and the clause are adverbial: they answers the question, When?

Adverb Test
Q: When did the farmer gasp?
A: After killing the goose. (adverbial phrase)
A: After he had killed the goose. (adverbial clause)

In short, subordinating conjunctions join clauses. So when in doubt, look for a tense-carrying verb.;-)
 
S

spot

Guest
Thank you so much. It makes sense. Is there a test to see if a word is an adverb or not? In another word, if somebody insists that "after" itself in this context is an adverb and not a preposition, what can you say? Can you say that adverb stands alone?
 

Casiopea

VIP Member
Joined
Sep 21, 2003
Member Type
Other
spot said:
Thank you so much. It makes sense. Is there a test to see if a word is an adverb or not? In another word, if somebody insists that "after" itself in this context is an adverb and not a preposition, what can you say? Can you say that adverb stands alone?
Well, easily enough, an adverb, as its name states, adds to the meaning of a verb. That is, adverbs modify verbs, so for our example, if 'After' is modifying a verb, then it's an adverb, and if it isn't modifying a verb, then it's not an adverb:

After killing the goose

Question: Is 'killing' a verb?
Answer: No. It's a gerund, a verbal noun.

Question: How do we know it's a gerund, because, you know, it does look like a verb?
Answer: words that end in -ing are not verbs. They are either present participles or gerunds, and only gerunds take objects:

killing (noun, gerund) + the goose (object of 'killing')

Moreover, gerunds, being nouns, act like nouns. They function as subjects and as objects.

Subject: Killing the goose was tedious work.
Object of the verb: Did you read Killing the goose?

Nouns also function as objects of prepositions:

Object of a preposition: Tell me about killing the goose.

The same holds true for our example:

Object of a preposition: After killing the goose

The thing about prepositional phrases is that they always express Where and When, which is a tell-tale sign that the phrase is functioning as an adverb.

Adverb Test
Q: When did the farmer gasp? (Adverb)
A: After killing the goose. (Adverb phrase)

In short, every word and phrase has two levels of representation: (1) its form (What it looks like) and (2) its function (What it does in the sentence).

The phrase 'After killing the goose' has the following representation:

Form: prepositional phrase

The phrase gets its name from the word that heads it. 'After' heads the phrase. We know 'After' is not an adverb: (a) it takes an object, and (b) that object is a noun ('killing').

Function: adverbial phrase
It answers the question, When?
 

Steven D

Senior Member
Joined
Sep 6, 2004
Member Type
English Teacher
Casiopea said:
A subordinating conjunction introduced a clause. (Please note, a clause has tense)

Conjunction: The farmer gasped after he had killed the goose.

'after', a subordinating conjunction, introduces the clause 'he had killed the goose'; note, 'had killed' carries tense.

If 'after' doesn't introduce a clause, then it's not a conjunction:

Preposition: After killing the goose, the farmer gasped.

'after', a preposition in form, heads the adverbial phrase 'After killing the goose'; note, 'killing' is not a verb.

Both the phrase and the clause are adverbial: they answers the question, When?

Adverb Test
Q: When did the farmer gasp?
A: After killing the goose. (adverbial phrase)
A: After he had killed the goose. (adverbial phrase)

In short, subordinating conjunctions join clauses. So when in doubt, look for a tense-carrying verb.;-)

A: After he had killed the goose. (adverbial phrase)

Hi,

Did you mean "after he had killed the goose" is a clause? I would call it a clause. It has a subject and a verb. Typo, right?
 

Casiopea

VIP Member
Joined
Sep 21, 2003
Member Type
Other
X Mode said:
A: After he had killed the goose. (adverbial phrase)

Hi,

Did you mean "after he had killed the goose" is a clause? I would call it a clause. It has a subject and a verb. Typo, right?
Yes. :oops: Thank you. :-D I shall edit it. :cool:

Given my pre-cold state at the time, I am surprised I hadn't written,

The goose gasped, after he had killed the farmer.:shock:
 

Steven D

Senior Member
Joined
Sep 6, 2004
Member Type
English Teacher
Casiopea said:
Yes. :oops: Thank you. :-D I shall edit it. :cool:

Given my pre-cold state at the time, I am surprised I hadn't written,

The goose gasped, after he had killed the farmer.:shock:

I've typed things in error before that I certainly didn't mean and would not have said.

It happens.

:cool:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top