Results 1 to 6 of 6
  1. #1
    Tan Elaine is offline Key Member
    • Member Info
      • Member Type:
      • Student or Learner
      • Native Language:
      • British English
      • Home Country:
      • Hong Kong
      • Current Location:
      • Hong Kong
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    2,043
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default Cheque/s Nos,/No

    1.Cheques No. 1, 2 and 3 are missing.

    2. Cheques Nos. 1, 2 and 3 are missing.

    3. Cheque Nos. 1, 2 and 3 are missing.

    Which is the correct sentence?

    Many thanks.

  2. #2
    Daruma is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    1,160
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default Re: Cheque/s Nos,/No

    Quote Originally Posted by Tan Elaine View Post
    1.Cheques No. 1, 2 and 3 are missing.

    2. Cheques Nos. 1, 2 and 3 are missing.

    3. Cheque Nos. 1, 2 and 3 are missing.

    Which is the correct sentence?

    Many thanks.
    Tan Elaine,

    I'd prefer #3 to the others. What would you choose?

  3. #3
    Tan Elaine is offline Key Member
    • Member Info
      • Member Type:
      • Student or Learner
      • Native Language:
      • British English
      • Home Country:
      • Hong Kong
      • Current Location:
      • Hong Kong
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    2,043
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default Re: Cheque/s Nos,/No

    Quote Originally Posted by Daruma View Post
    Tan Elaine,

    I'd prefer #3 to the others. What would you choose?
    Hi Daruma

    I'd opt for #3 too, but I wonder whether others will agree with us.
    Last edited by Tan Elaine; 15-Jun-2009 at 08:54.

  4. #4
    Tan Elaine is offline Key Member
    • Member Info
      • Member Type:
      • Student or Learner
      • Native Language:
      • British English
      • Home Country:
      • Hong Kong
      • Current Location:
      • Hong Kong
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    2,043
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default Re: Cheque/s Nos,/No

    Could some member please confirm whether Daruma and I are correct? Neither of us knows whether we are correct.

    Many thanks.

  5. #5
    bhaisahab's Avatar
    bhaisahab is offline Moderator
    • Member Info
      • Member Type:
      • Retired English Teacher
      • Native Language:
      • British English
      • Home Country:
      • England
      • Current Location:
      • England
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    22,549
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default Re: Cheque/s Nos,/No

    Quote Originally Posted by Tan Elaine View Post
    Could some member please confirm whether Daruma and I are correct? Neither of us knows whether we are correct.

    Many thanks.

    1., 2. and 3. are all correct.

  6. #6
    konungursvia's Avatar
    konungursvia is offline Key Member
    • Member Info
      • Member Type:
      • Academic
      • Native Language:
      • English
      • Home Country:
      • Canada
      • Current Location:
      • Canada
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    4,802
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default Re: Cheque/s Nos,/No

    Well, perhaps, but not entirely. Only 2 is completely correct in my view, though 1 is also quite acceptable. Number 3 is fairly common but is an error.

    It all goes back to the Italians, who gave us our modern punctuation. There are two correct ways to abbreviate:

    a) Write the first letter or two followed by a period. Example: Main St. Kennedy Av.

    b) Write the first letter followed by the last letter or two (traditionally in superscript), with no period: Example: Dr [Doctor], Messrs [Messeurs, Misters], No 5 [Number 5]; Kennedy Ave or Clinton Blvd and so on.

    Frequently, in English people have confused the two and put a period or full stop in the second case. It has now become very common. But if you want to be entirely correct, you should omit the full stop in the second type of case, where the last letter appears alongside the first letter: Rev. or Revd, M. or Mr, Pte or Private, Sgt or Sargeant, Cpl or Corporal, Col. or Colonel, Maj. or Major, Gen. or General, Lt or Lieutenant, etc.

    Strangely, we have adopted the Italian and French abbreviation for numéro / numero, [No] even though we write the full word as Number. So, putting a period after the No. is not really correct, and using the plural (numbers 1, 2 and 3) is more correct than the singular (number 1, 2 and 3).

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •