**This Poll:**

- Votes:
**558** - Comments:
**5** - Added:
**August 2003**

**All Polls:**

- Polls:
**1,045** - Votes:
**550,261** - Comments:
**4,350**

tabbyjohnson28

welll GOd made it sooo yeah :0

Kamal

this my farst time i ues this siet. and i would like to say thank you to my teacher she show my how to use it. thank for hir. plaselet me know

Ben Curtis

Clearly there are infinitely many sentences - just take "John knows that p", John knows that he knows that p", "John knows that he knows that he knows that p" etc. But don't get this confused with the question of whether there are any infinitely long sentences. This I doubt. I think there are infinitely many sentences, but each is finite. (In fact, as it happens, I think there are aleph0 many sentences - not any higher infinity many, as some have claimed.)

Randall Goodwin

Language is a collection of artifacts and instantiations of meaning. As a real collection it is not infinite. Even though we can assert that language is infinite, that is not a language that is accessible. That smacks of deification of language. An example of this is Heidegger in his book "On the Way to Language". Langauge is an open set so we can theoretically add to it infinitely, but only if we have infinite time, which we don't. We can theorize infinite combinations, but again only with infinite time. We can describe from a set of potentially infinite referents, but we cannot describe all of the infinite set. Chomsky makes language his deity in this statement. But he also forsakes a true scientific analysis. It is not even possible to find a sound mathematical description of language which would make it infinite. I know I tried. I think that the theory is a cop out. We can state it as infinite but this is philosphy by pronouncement. It assumes an epistemological position which is not clearly stated. It assumes language to be a thing of a certain type. There is no evidence that language exists outside of its artifacts and instantiations. We can study its structures and histories and interactions. We can predict its future. But linguistics as a descriptive science is not describing the infinite it describes just the particulars and their properties as a collective statistical phenomenon.

Loading

- What's New |
- RSS Feeds |
- Site News |
- Site Map |
- Staff & Contributors |
- About Us |
- Link to Us |
- Advertising

- Terms of Use |
- Privacy Policy |
- Copyright © 2002 - 2014 UsingEnglish.com. All rights reserved.

- Generated in 0.016 seconds

gustavo

i dont hablo ingles pero estoy aprendiendo ahora mismo