I can't think of any verbs that mean "I ___ myself."
We can say that the English middle voice occurs when you have a verb which is syntatically active but semantically passive.
e.g.: "The broth cooked very fast."
=>In this example, the verb TO COOK is in the active voice, but semantically we understand that the noun BROTH "suffers" the action TO COOK.
I feel that verbs such as rise and lie should be considered middle voice instead of only explaining them as intransitive. My reason for this is that the current explanation doesn't help people know when they should be used. Hence the total confusion in normal speech. Once students understand that lie and rise are reflexive or middle voice, they understand why they are only used in certain situations.
'Middle voice' should form grammatically as in ancient Greek, for example. Since there is not any grammatical way to construct the middle voice, there is no middle voice in English at all.
English often uses the same form for diffferent purposes. EG: Work is a good thing-work is a noun. I work-work is a verb. This disinterest in form makes English a bad language for communication say some, but others like lawyers and politicinas use the incoherence of form to their advantage. The middle voice in English must be discerned by effect, and not by form. EG: The glass shattered; The crowd gathered. These verbs are in the middle voice by effect and not by form. The lack of attention to form is a choice of language speakers, but language writers must be aware of the different forms because they accomplish diferent purposes. Use them in writing like lawyers and politicians do in speaking.