Poll: 'Should' can replace 'would' in formal English for 'I' and 'we'.

'Should' can replace 'would' in formal English for 'I' and 'we'.

I agree
I disagree

Votes: 385
Comments: 6
Added: August 2003

 

Comments:

G - 9th January 2004 11:18
"Should you want to do that," I don't think so.
 
Joan - 15th January 2004 01:29
In a formal letter, you can write 'I should be grateful...'. in British English.
 
## - 14th December 2004 02:06
It can, but I don't like it much.
 
Martin - 3rd May 2006 00:59
I'm confuzzled at the question. Arn't should and would completly two different meaning words? How can you then just change them and not change the meaning of the sentance.
 
RonBee - 25th November 2006 06:46
I'm confuzzled at the question too.
;-)
 
thebooklass - 23rd February 2009 21:36
"Should" suggests that the person's actions are expected but does not mean that that is what they do, say, feel, etc... It suggests obligation. "Would" means an action is a certainty.
 
You must vote before you can post a comment.
Browse our language polls:
Page: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 |  Next »