Poll: No text is free of other texts.- Ferdinand de Saussure

No text is free of other texts.- Ferdinand de Saussure

I agree.
I disagree.

Votes: 339
Comments: 11
Added: September 2003

Comments:

Willbut - 5th September 2003 17:55
Language cannot exist in a vacuum, so I think he's right.
 
Casiopea - 26th September 2003 17:35
I believe Saussure was advocating that there are no novel ideas in the world; That is, a new idea is not only based within a old idea, and so on, but that even the language used to communicate new ideas is 'not free'.
 
tdol - 6th November 2003 23:42
As language is a continuum, there are always going to be connections, aren't there?
 
Joan - 24th November 2003 23:25
So nothing can be truly revolutionary?
 
italianbrother - 26th December 2003 02:00
As pessimistic as it may sound, we are living in a plagiarised world.
 
italianbrother - 26th December 2003 02:09
"So nothing can be truly revolutionary?" It of curse can be, but it is so easy to follow, to be conformist, rather than create etc… etc… it is the true anti-conformist that we need.
 
JT - 15th January 2004 01:59
Isn't the revolutionary, by definition, reacting against something. Therefore, the revolutionary text, while advocating a break with the past, is far from free of it.
 
said madhoun - 17th October 2004 14:33
That's fantastic
 
santhosh - 23rd August 2007 06:54
Thoughts of each man have some sort of link to that of others. One cannot escape from this phenomenon when one express any thing.
 
Sena Jonathan - 24th May 2009 08:06
language forms a continuum, so that there is a sequence of relatedness all through texts, it's why i agree with Saussure.
 
Ben Curtis - 3rd November 2009 18:04
Well, I don't know whether I disagree or not, as I haven't a bloody clue what he's saying (or even what he's trying to say).
 
You must vote before you can post a comment.
Browse our language polls:
Page: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 |  Next »