Does the present progressive have a passive form? |
|
Votes: 445
Comments: 7
Added: September 2003
| aneta - 28th March 2004 20:01 |
| I think it has as it's formed according to the grammatical rules of the English language. It's also in a way necessary especially if it comes to the precision in meaning as well as differenciation between durative and non durative activities. |
| Geoff - 11th June 2004 03:16 |
| It's being done. |
| r - 1st March 2005 01:23 |
| i don't know |
| bert - 7th June 2006 15:32 |
| I am being eaten! |
| odrik - 6th May 2008 03:18 |
| i think it has a passive form because the correct form is : present progessive passive . we use is/are being + past participle |
| InGriD - 9th July 2008 21:34 |
| i think yes |
| i am a stupid - 28th November 2008 06:03 |
| In my opinion is yes because I think that in every verb tense uses to have or to be |
