Does the present progressive have a passive form? |
|
|
| Votes: 346 |
Comments: 6 |
Added: September 2003 |
Comments:
| aneta - 28th March 2004 20:01
|
| I think it has as it's formed according to the grammatical rules of the English language. It's also in a way necessary especially if it comes to the precision in meaning as well as differenciation between durative and non durative activities.
|
| |
| Geoff - 11th June 2004 03:16
|
| It's being done.
|
| |
| r - 1st March 2005 01:23
|
| i don't know
|
| |
| bert - 7th June 2006 15:32
|
| I am being eaten!
|
| |
| odrik - 6th May 2008 03:18
|
| i think it has a passive form because the correct form is : present progessive passive . we use is/are being + past participle
|
| |
| InGriD - 9th July 2008 21:34
|
| i think yes
|
| |
You must vote before you can post a comment.
Browse our language polls:
|
 |
| Poll Statistics |
Polls: 771
Votes: 189,283
Comments: 1,898 |
|
