relate

Status
Not open for further replies.

Taka

Senior Member
Joined
Mar 7, 2004
Member Type
Other
Native Language
Japanese
Home Country
Japan
Current Location
Japan
What do you think this 'relate' means?

People in that country have always related themselves to nature.

And does the sentence above mean almost the same as these?

Life in that country has always been related to nature.
Life in that country has always had to do with nature.
 
Last edited:

Barb_D

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Mar 12, 2007
Member Type
Other
Native Language
American English
Home Country
United States
Current Location
United States
It's an unnatural sentence in my opinion.

What is its source?
 

Taka

Senior Member
Joined
Mar 7, 2004
Member Type
Other
Native Language
Japanese
Home Country
Japan
Current Location
Japan
No source. I've been wondering how I rewrite 'People in that country have been living in harmony with nature' using 'relate'. Do you think it's impossible? If it's impossible, are there any other ways to rewrite it?

(And Do you think only the first one is unnatural? Or the last two don't seem to work either?)
 
Last edited:

Barb_D

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Mar 12, 2007
Member Type
Other
Native Language
American English
Home Country
United States
Current Location
United States
None of the three are good. The one about "living in harmony with nature" is good. Why do you want to use "relate"? I"m sure it's not impossible, but why make a difficult task when the answer is right there?
 

Barb_D

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Mar 12, 2007
Member Type
Other
Native Language
American English
Home Country
United States
Current Location
United States
None of the three are good. The one about "living in harmony with nature" is good. Why do you want to use "relate"? I"m sure it's not impossible, but why make a difficult task when the answer is right there?
 

Taka

Senior Member
Joined
Mar 7, 2004
Member Type
Other
Native Language
Japanese
Home Country
Japan
Current Location
Japan
Then what about this? Does this sound OK?

Nature has (always) been part of their life in that country.

If it worked, which among the two below would sound better as the same?

To the people in that country, nature has (always) been part of life.
For the people in that country, nature has (always) been part of life.

 

Barb_D

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Mar 12, 2007
Member Type
Other
Native Language
American English
Home Country
United States
Current Location
United States
For people in that country, living with nature has always been important.
People in that country have always seen how their lives relate to nature. (There's a relate one for you. Still not better than the "in harmony" one.)
 

Taka

Senior Member
Joined
Mar 7, 2004
Member Type
Other
Native Language
Japanese
Home Country
Japan
Current Location
Japan
Thanks for the great alternatives!

And what about the one with 'part of their life'?
 
Last edited:

Barb_D

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Mar 12, 2007
Member Type
Other
Native Language
American English
Home Country
United States
Current Location
United States
It's okay. I gave you the first sentence as an alternative to that one.
 

Taka

Senior Member
Joined
Mar 7, 2004
Member Type
Other
Native Language
Japanese
Home Country
Japan
Current Location
Japan
Good.

And about the prepositions 'for' and to', do they both work fine? Or is one better than the other?

To the people in that country, nature has (always) been part of life.
For the people in that country, nature has (always) been part of life.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top