[Grammar] omission of to in to-infinitive.

Status
Not open for further replies.

wotcha

Senior Member
Joined
Jun 29, 2010
Member Type
English Teacher
Native Language
Korean
Home Country
South Korea
Current Location
South Korea
I've learned that 'to' can be omitted when it is used as a complement of a be verb in sentences that are initiated by 'what S + V ', 'All S + V' and 'The only thing S + V ' clauses. For example


1. What I want is back to school
2. What I want is to go back to school
3. What I want is going back to school.

All three sentence are grammatically correct. - Is that right?

Also,

4. All you need is study hard.
5. The only thing you need is be independent.

Are the sentence 4 and 5 grammatically acceptable?


Thanks in advance. ^_^;
 

5jj

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 14, 2010
Member Type
English Teacher
Native Language
British English
Home Country
Czech Republic
Current Location
Czech Republic
1. What I want is back to school.X
2. What I want is to go back to school. :tick:
2a. What I want to do is (to) go back to school. :tick:
3. What I want is going back to school.X
4. All you need is study hard.X
4a. All you need to do is (to) study hard.:tick:
5. The only thing you need is be independent. X;
5
 

wotcha

Senior Member
Joined
Jun 29, 2010
Member Type
English Teacher
Native Language
Korean
Home Country
South Korea
Current Location
South Korea


What about this sentence?

'The only thing you have to remember is bring your passport'


Is it correct?

^^;;
 

BobK

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Jul 29, 2006
Location
Spencers Wood, near Reading, UK
Member Type
Retired English Teacher
Native Language
English
Home Country
UK
Current Location
UK
:up: [addressed to 5jj's post]1 is not unlike a form with 'rid', common in Scotland and many other dialectal forms: 'I want rid of him' [=I want to be rid of him].

The words 'The only thing you have to remember is [this], or : bring your passport' would be acceptable if the intonation reflected the punctuation I've added.

b
 
Last edited:

philo2009

Senior Member
Joined
Jan 16, 2009
Member Type
Academic
Native Language
British English
Home Country
UK
Current Location
Japan
I've learned that 'to' can be omitted when it is used as a complement of a be verb in sentences that are initiated by 'what S + V ', 'All S + V' and 'The only thing S + V ' clauses.

You've either misremembered, or been mis-taught, the rule, which is that omission of 'to' before a complemental infinitive (VP2) in such constructions as [All + S + VP1 + is + VP2] occurs

(1) (obligatorily) where the finite element of VP1 is either a form of 'do' or a modal auxiliary with 'do' as its dependent, thus

All he did was wait.

All he does is wait.


All he can do is wait.

(NOT: *...to wait..)

(2) (optionally) where the finite element of VP1 is a non-modal verb complemented by 'to do', thus

All he has to do is wait.

(or ...to wait...)

In the case of constructions not covered by the above rule, the form of VP2 is simply identical to that of any verbal dependent of VP1, thus e.g.

All I want is to go back to school.


(Not: *...go back...)

All I enjoy is sitting and listening to music.


(Not: *... (to) sit and (to) listen...)

and so forth.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top