I had thought the comparative form of angry is "angrier" until I came across an article in which "more angry" is used. Are they both OK? Or one is more informally used? Looking forward to your help.
***** NOT A TEACHER *****
Good afternoon, Chance22.
(1) I believe that speakers and writers often have a choice between using " -er " or "more."
(2) Sometimes it seems to depend on the sound of the adjective or the rhythm of the whole sentence.
(a) Tom is famouser/ more famous than Sue.
(i) I think most people prefer the sound of "more famous."
(3) Sometimes -- as you so correctly said -- it depends on how formal you want to be.
(a) One book gives this example:
(i) Tom is cleverer than Sue = informal.
(ii) Tom is more clever than Sue =formal.
(4) Another book reminds us that sometimes you CANNOT use -er.
(a) When you compare two descriptions of a person, you need "more":
(i) Tom is more lazy than stupid.
(a) You CANNOT say: Tom is lazier than stupid.
Therefore, I think that you would have to say:
I was more angry than embarrassed. (NOT: I was angrier than embarrassed.)
(5) Sometimes it is your choice. You may choose the one that sounds "smoother" to your ears:
(a) Don't say that to Tom. It will only make him angrier/ more angry.
Which one do you prefer? (I prefer "angrier")
(b) Why are you so calm and quiet? I think that you should get angrier/ more angry about what they did to you.
Which one do you prefer? (I prefer "more angry")
Have a nice day!