"pour" or "dump"

Status
Not open for further replies.

LeTyan

Member
Joined
Dec 18, 2011
Member Type
Interested in Language
Native Language
Chinese
Home Country
China
Current Location
China
Hi,

___ into oceans and rivers is a serious form of pollution.

A. Pouring sewage
B. Throwing garbage
C. Dumping sewage
D. Emptying litter

Please tell me which is the answer you pick and why you believe it is better than others

Thanks!
 

Amigos4

VIP Member
Joined
Oct 1, 2007
Member Type
Academic
Native Language
American English
Home Country
United States
Current Location
United States
Hi,

___ into oceans and rivers is a serious form of pollution.

A. Pouring sewage
B. Throwing garbage
C. Dumping sewage
D. Emptying litter

Please tell me which is the answer you pick and why you believe it is better than others

Thanks!
Which answer do you pick? Tell us why and we'll be happy to let you know what we think. ;-)
 

LeTyan

Member
Joined
Dec 18, 2011
Member Type
Interested in Language
Native Language
Chinese
Home Country
China
Current Location
China
As a non-native speaker of English, I have heard "pour... into" "dump ....into" "throw..in/into". So I would say A, B,C are all workable answers. But the given answer is C. I don't understand why it is better
 

Amigos4

VIP Member
Joined
Oct 1, 2007
Member Type
Academic
Native Language
American English
Home Country
United States
Current Location
United States
As a non-native speaker of English, I have heard "pour... into" "dump ....into" "throw..in/into". So I would say A, B,C are all workable answers. But the given answer is C. I don't understand why it is better
As a native speaker, I think A, B, C, and D are all valid sentences. My guess is that because oceans and rivers are being used as dumps/landfills, the sewage is being dumped into the water. I think the question you were asked to answer is poorly stated because more than one correct answer is possible.
 

Tdol

No Longer With Us (RIP)
Staff member
Joined
Nov 13, 2002
Native Language
British English
Home Country
UK
Current Location
Japan
I agree- it's not a good question. C is the most natural to me, but there are other possibilities.
 

Raymott

VIP Member
Joined
Jun 29, 2008
Member Type
Academic
Native Language
English
Home Country
Australia
Current Location
Australia
I never thought of emptying sewage into the ocean as a serious form of pollution. Don't whales and fish defecate? Aren't animal excretions a source of nutrition for the ocean's plants, which account for 85% of the earth's plant biomass?
On the other hand, you'd have to consider what's in the 'garbage' and 'litter' and how much was put into the sea before being able to answer that question. Plastic bags do the environment no good at all. It's not an English question.
 

konungursvia

VIP Member
Joined
Mar 20, 2009
Member Type
Academic
Native Language
English
Home Country
Canada
Current Location
Canada
I never thought of emptying sewage into the ocean as a serious form of pollution. Don't whales and fish defecate? Aren't animal excretions a source of nutrition for the ocean's plants, which account for 85% of the earth's plant biomass?
On the other hand, you'd have to consider what's in the 'garbage' and 'litter' and how much was put into the sea before being able to answer that question. Plastic bags do the environment no good at all. It's not an English question.

I think it's a question of local concentration. If every human were swimming in a different area of the sea, and defecated at will, there may be no problem. But if a city of ten million dumps all of its sewage (and dumps are raw and untreated in most cities after heavy rain) you've essentially got a major 'infection' at a particular location, which can make others ill (humans and wildlife). So it needs to be managed.
 

Gillnetter

Key Member
Joined
Jan 16, 2010
Member Type
English Teacher
Native Language
English
Home Country
United States
Current Location
United States
I never thought of emptying sewage into the ocean as a serious form of pollution. Don't whales and fish defecate? Aren't animal excretions a source of nutrition for the ocean's plants, which account for 85% of the earth's plant biomass?
On the other hand, you'd have to consider what's in the 'garbage' and 'litter' and how much was put into the sea before being able to answer that question. Plastic bags do the environment no good at all. It's not an English question.
Whether to use "emptying" or "dumping", in regards to allowing sewage to be put into the ocean, seems to be a matter of perspective. The southern beaches of the San Diego, California area are routinely closed because of high bacteria levels. Sewage does not only consist of human waste, it also includes various chemicals and other waste from industry. The villain here is water coming out of the Mexican city of Tijuana. The Tijuana River flows across the international border into the ocean and is emptied/discharged/dumped on the US side. If scientists are talking about this problem, they say that the contaminated water is "discharged". If a conservative politician is speaking of the problem, he/she will say that the water is "dumped". A geography textbook will probably use the word "emptied".
 

Raymott

VIP Member
Joined
Jun 29, 2008
Member Type
Academic
Native Language
English
Home Country
Australia
Current Location
Australia
I think it's a question of local concentration. If every human were swimming in a different area of the sea, and defecated at will, there may be no problem. But if a city of ten million dumps all of its sewage (and dumps are raw and untreated in most cities after heavy rain) you've essentially got a major 'infection' at a particular location, which can make others ill (humans and wildlife). So it needs to be managed.
Exactly. I think we agree, though, that it's a question of where to place the effluent rather than where to place an adverb, for example.
If all four choices included "sewage", at least it would be an English question - not a good one, but at least one in which the student had to choose the appropriate verb.
 

konungursvia

VIP Member
Joined
Mar 20, 2009
Member Type
Academic
Native Language
English
Home Country
Canada
Current Location
Canada
I agree, but would add that the difference in verb probably is intended to relate to a presumed knowledge of what *hit is coming from the sewers. If it's a colloidal suspension, I'd say 'dump' is much better than pour. If it's really a liquid, pour is probably better. I'm not sure it's an English language question though, but one of culture or general education (I remember a story of an Entire class of Saudi ESL students choosing "B. Bad weather" to describe a picture of the sun overhead with kids playing beneath).
 

SoothingDave

VIP Member
Joined
Apr 17, 2009
Member Type
Interested in Language
Native Language
American English
Home Country
United States
Current Location
United States
As a native speaker, I think A, B, C, and D are all valid sentences. My guess is that because oceans and rivers are being used as dumps/landfills, the sewage is being dumped into the water. I think the question you were asked to answer is poorly stated because more than one correct answer is possible.

I don't see how "emptying litter" makes any sense.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top