Johnny painted his old jalopy purple vs Johnny painted his old purple jalopy

Status
Not open for further replies.

anhnha

Senior Member
Joined
May 5, 2012
Member Type
Student or Learner
Native Language
Vietnamese
Home Country
Vietnam
Current Location
Vietnam
1.Johnny painted his old jalopy purple.
2.Johnny painted his old purple jalopy.
Is there any difference in meaning between #1 and #2?
Is #1 better than #2?
 

JMurray

Key Member
Joined
Nov 17, 2010
Member Type
Interested in Language
Native Language
English
Home Country
New Zealand
Current Location
Australia
1.Johnny painted his old jalopy purple.
2.Johnny painted his old purple jalopy.


These would normally be understood to have different meanings.
1) We don't know what colour his jalopy was before he painted it purple.
2) We know his jalopy was purple before he painted it, so he either painted it purple again or some other colour.

not a teacher
 
Last edited by a moderator:

anhnha

Senior Member
Joined
May 5, 2012
Member Type
Student or Learner
Native Language
Vietnamese
Home Country
Vietnam
Current Location
Vietnam
Thanks,
Can I rewrite #1 as follows?
Johnny painted purple to his old jalopy.

 

JMurray

Key Member
Joined
Nov 17, 2010
Member Type
Interested in Language
Native Language
English
Home Country
New Zealand
Current Location
Australia
Can I rewrite #1 as follows?
Johnny painted purple to his old jalopy.


No. If Johnny is applying purple paint to his jalopy the most natural form is (1) as you first wrote it.
Or possibly, "Johnny put purple (paint) on his old jalopy", but unlike (1), this doesn't necessarily suggest that he painted the whole car.

not a teacher
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top