Sometimes I wonder what happened to me over the last 40 years. I don't understand that.
What do you mean?
Further thoughts to this topic. I met several similar threads in several forums. Some people think that "who" is a relative pronoun with an antecedent.
"who" is not a relative pronoun in the sentence, in my opinion, and there is no antecedent either.
If it were so, this would mean in
It is I who am right,
"I who am right" were a single constituent, a single nominal phrase with "I" as the head,
It is [I who am right]
[I who am right] is. :cross:
It is I [who is right]
[who is right] is I :tick:
which, as we can see above, this does not (mean).
If "I who is right" is not a single constituent, this means "who
is right" is not a postmodifier to "I", not a relative clause. What is "who is right" then?
It is this:
Who is right is I.
In the canonically
interrogative clause, which is in copulative relation to "I", "who" is acting as a conjunctive pronoun. "who is right" is postposed to the tail end of the sentence via the process of clefting to give it heightened focus.
In interrogative sentences with "who", the verb is always singular third person. Always. Never else.
Who
is this? It is
I.
Who
is this? It is
we.
Who
is this? It is
you.
So,
It is I who is right. :tick:
It is I who am right :cross:
QED