[Grammar] relative pronoun, which

Status
Not open for further replies.

yuriya

Member
Joined
Apr 23, 2010
Member Type
Student or Learner
Native Language
Korean
Home Country
South Korea
Current Location
South Korea
What do you think is the antecedent of which in the following example?
He began digging again with more energy. A tear grew in his eyes. Not because the dumpster smelled rank, which it did, but because he felt horrible for having let his best friend down.

Thanks in advance!
 

bertietheblue

Senior Member
Joined
May 21, 2010
Member Type
Other
Native Language
English
Home Country
UK
Current Location
UK
dumpster, for sure - you could rephrase this with less emphasis as 'not because of the dumpster, which smelled rank, but because ...'
 

yuriya

Member
Joined
Apr 23, 2010
Member Type
Student or Learner
Native Language
Korean
Home Country
South Korea
Current Location
South Korea
Not because the dumpster smelled rank, which it did

The antecedent is not Dumpster because if it is, what is the antecedent of it then? To me, the antecedent seems to be smelled rank; however, a verb phrase as an antecedent is kind of new to me, which was again the reason for this query. Any thoughts on this?
 
Last edited:

Raymott

VIP Member
Joined
Jun 29, 2008
Member Type
Academic
Native Language
English
Home Country
Australia
Current Location
Australia
dumpster, for sure - you could rephrase this with less emphasis as 'not because of the dumpster, which smelled rank, but because ...'
Surely, in the phrase "which it did", 'it' refers to the dumpster.
If so, how can 'which' also refer to the dumpster?

One possibility: 'Which' refers to 'rank', 'it' refers to 'dumpster', and 'did' refers to 'smelled'.
"Not because the dumpster smelled rank, which it did, but..." = "Not because the dumpster smelled rank, and rank the dumpster smelled, but ..."

Another possibility: 'Which' could refer to "smell rank" if you read it as: "Not because the dumpster smelled rank, and smell rank the dumpster did, but ..."

Naturally, you can make 'which' refer to 'dumpster' by writing a different sentence.

PS: I posted this before I read your (yuria) above post. I agree.
 

bertietheblue

Senior Member
Joined
May 21, 2010
Member Type
Other
Native Language
English
Home Country
UK
Current Location
UK
Surely, in the phrase "which it did", 'it' refers to the dumpster.
If so, how can 'which' also refer to the dumpster?

One possibility: 'Which' refers to 'rank', 'it' refers to 'dumpster', and 'did' refers to 'smelled'.
"Not because the dumpster smelled rank, which it did, but..." = "Not because the dumpster smelled rank, and rank the dumpster smelled, but ..."

Another possibility: 'Which' could refer to "smell rank" if you read it as: "Not because the dumpster smelled rank, and smell rank the dumpster did, but ..."

Naturally, you can make 'which' refer to 'dumpster' by writing a different sentence.

PS: I posted this before I read your (yuria) above post. I agree.

:oops: Oops, wrong again! I'm going to have to stop posting in my fag breaks and limit myself to a few posts when I've got time to read more attentively. Until then, with apologies!
 

TheParser

VIP Member
Joined
Dec 8, 2009
Member Type
Other
Native Language
English
Home Country
United States
Current Location
United States
What do you think is the antecedent of which in the following example?


Thanks in advance!

***** NOT A TEACHER *****

Good morning, Yuriya.

(1) Thanks for another thought-provoking question.

(2) I found something in Professor George O. Curme's scholarly book:

In descriptive relative clauses that refer to a THOUGHT, AN IDEA, whether

contained in a PROPOSITION, A GROUP OF WORDS, or a single NOUN or

ADJECTIVE, "which" is used with reference to a preceding statement or to

a single noun or adjective.

(3) Then the professor gives examples:

I am getting gray and wrinkled, which is not particularly cheering.

We talked a long while about our boyhood days, after which we had a

good dinner.

When overwrought, which he often was, he became acutely irritable.
( from a novel by Ms. Charlotte Bronte)

(4) Since you are a serious and advanced student, do think about trying

to get a copy of Dr. Curme's two-volume A GRAMMAR OF THE ENGLISH

LANGUAGE. It was written in the 1930's and is probably out-of-print.

He covers the historical development of English with many examples from

literature. I believe it is what people call a tour de force.

Have a nice day!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top