sequence of tenses

Status
Not open for further replies.

ridvann

Member
Joined
Dec 5, 2011
Member Type
Student or Learner
Native Language
Turkmen
Home Country
Turkmenistan
Current Location
Turkmenistan
Hello,

-I learnt yesterday when you would go to Paris.

-I learnt yesterday when you will go to Paris.

The first part of the sentence is past, the second one is the action which will be in future. And I want to ask which one must be used to be more clear?

Thanks...
 

5jj

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 14, 2010
Member Type
English Teacher
Native Language
British English
Home Country
Czech Republic
Current Location
Czech Republic
As the going to Paris is still in the future, both are fine. Backshifting (into a past-tense form) is almost always correct in indirect speech. If the situation reported is still true, then backshifting is not essential.
 

ridvann

Member
Joined
Dec 5, 2011
Member Type
Student or Learner
Native Language
Turkmen
Home Country
Turkmenistan
Current Location
Turkmenistan
So many thanks... And then the sentences I wrote are correct too.

I already knew we can.
Could you guess we will be able to do this?

P.S :The situation reported is still true.
 

bhaisahab

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Apr 12, 2008
Member Type
Retired English Teacher
Native Language
British English
Home Country
England
Current Location
Ireland
So many thanks... And then the sentences I wrote are correct too.

I already knew we can.
Could you guess we will be able to do this?

P.S :The situation reported is still true.
No, those are not correct.
 

ridvann

Member
Joined
Dec 5, 2011
Member Type
Student or Learner
Native Language
Turkmen
Home Country
Turkmenistan
Current Location
Turkmenistan
But the teacher 5jj said that we can use. I couldn't understand why the first post is correct as he said, and why the second is wrong as you said to me.
 

ridvann

Member
Joined
Dec 5, 2011
Member Type
Student or Learner
Native Language
Turkmen
Home Country
Turkmenistan
Current Location
Turkmenistan
I will write a few sentences to be more clear.

-Don't worry Jessica, I already knew where youl will go.

-I couldn't understand why the students can't understand this problem.

- Calinda: I can't leave this town.
Camella:Don't worry... I guessed you can't leave this town.

P.S: The situation is still true. Could you please correct me because I have been confused. If the sentence I wrote are not natural, could you please write some more natural sentenes?

Thanks all...
 

bhaisahab

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Apr 12, 2008
Member Type
Retired English Teacher
Native Language
British English
Home Country
England
Current Location
Ireland
I will write a few sentences to be more clear.

-Don't worry Jessica, I already knew where youl will go.

-I couldn't understand why the students can't understand this problem.

- Calinda: I can't leave this town.
Camella:Don't worry... I guessed you can't leave this town.

P.S: The situation is still true. Could you please correct me because I have been confused. If the sentence I wrote are not natural, could you please write some more natural sentenes?

Thanks all...
-Don't worry Jessica, I already knew where you would go.
-I couldn't understand why the students couldn't understand this problem.
- Calinda: I can't leave this town.
Camella:Don't worry... I guessed you couldn't leave this town.
 

ridvann

Member
Joined
Dec 5, 2011
Member Type
Student or Learner
Native Language
Turkmen
Home Country
Turkmenistan
Current Location
Turkmenistan
As the going to Paris is still in the future, both are fine. Backshifting (into a past-tense form) is almost always correct in indirect speech. If the situation reported is still true, then backshifting is not essential.

-I learnt yesterday when you would go to Paris.

-I learnt yesterday when you will go to Paris.

But he said that they are correct. And it made sense to me. For this reason I have been confused.
 

bhaisahab

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Apr 12, 2008
Member Type
Retired English Teacher
Native Language
British English
Home Country
England
Current Location
Ireland
I have given you my opinion. I can do no more than that.
 

ridvann

Member
Joined
Dec 5, 2011
Member Type
Student or Learner
Native Language
Turkmen
Home Country
Turkmenistan
Current Location
Turkmenistan
Thanks for all the answers...
 

5jj

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 14, 2010
Member Type
English Teacher
Native Language
British English
Home Country
Czech Republic
Current Location
Czech Republic
With the wisom of hindsight, I can see that my first response, "As the going to Paris is still in the future, both are fine. Backshifting (into a past-tense form) is almost always correct in indirect speech. If the situation reported is still true, then backshifting is not essential" was a little simplistic. It is reasonably satisfactory for reported speech, i.e. the reporting of words that were said:

Monday, 0930: Peter: I am going to Paris tomorrow.

Monday, 14.00: Paul: Peter said that he is/was going to Paris tomorrow.
Tuesday, 0930: Peter said that he [STRIKE]is[/STRIKE]/was going to Paris [STRIKE]tomorrow[/STRIKE]/the next day/yesterday.

With other forms of indirect speech, a lot depends on the context, and on the 'reporting' verb. In your first pair,

- I learnt yesterday when you would go to Paris.
- I learnt yesterday when you will go to Paris
.

I considered 'I learnt' to convey a similar message to 'somebody told me', and that actual words were in effect dealing with reported speech.

With 'I already knew where you will/would go', we have a different situation. At the time that 'I' had this knowledge, it was knowledge of the certainty of 'your' future action. 'I' could not know that this would still be a certainty at a later time. So, we normally report only our past knowledge 'I knew where you would go' or our present state of knowledge (which may prove to be incorrect), 'I know where you will go'.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top