[Grammar] how about...will be held orto be to be held?

Status
Not open for further replies.

scrooge1974

Junior Member
Joined
Jan 25, 2012
Member Type
Student or Learner
Native Language
Italian
Home Country
Italy
Current Location
Italy
Good afternoon and happy new year :-D,

Is it right to say "the conference is to be held on March the 3rd 2013" or "the conference will be held on March the 3rd 2013'?
If the first phrase is correct too, which kind of future is "to be to be + past participle"?:roll:
Thanks a lot,
Luigi
 

riquecohen

VIP Member
Joined
Aug 24, 2010
Member Type
English Teacher
Native Language
American English
Home Country
United States
Current Location
Brazil
Both grammatical structures are correct, however in AmE we would write the date as March 3, 2013 or March 3rd 2013. It is possible to use a comma after 3rd. When speaking, we would say March third or March the third. There are many variations in both AmE and BrE.

I'm not sure what you mean by to be to be. Your example, to be held, is a passive infinitive and is commonly used in notices and announcements. See section 97/2 in Swan's Practical English Usage (1984).
 

scrooge1974

Junior Member
Joined
Jan 25, 2012
Member Type
Student or Learner
Native Language
Italian
Home Country
Italy
Current Location
Italy
In a podcast I have read "The Olympic Games are to be held in Beijing in China.". Well, I think it's just a future tense that, isn't it? Why do they use this kind of future, instead of the progressive tense or the future, such as "The Games are holding or are going to be held etcetera?
waiting for an explanation, thanks a lot
Luigi
 

emsr2d2

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Jul 28, 2009
Member Type
English Teacher
Native Language
British English
Home Country
UK
Current Location
UK
Good afternoon and happy new year :-D,

Is it right to say "the conference is to be held on March the 3rd 2013" or "the conference will be held on March the 3rd 2013'?
If the first phrase is correct too, which kind of future is "to be to be + past participle"?:roll:
Thanks a lot,
Luigi

Both are acceptable. Like riquecohen, I would remove "the" in the date.

The conference will be held on March 3rd 2013.
The conference is to be held on March 3rd 2013.
The conference will take place on March 3rd 2013.
The conference is to take place on March 3rd 2013.

You could also use "3rd March 2013", "3-3-2013" or "3/3/2013 (luckily, 3rd March means that it doesn't matter whether you're using the British or American number order for dates. Had it been 4th March, it would be 4-3-2013 or 4/3/2013 in BrE, but 3-4-2013 or 3/4/2013 in AmE).
 

scrooge1974

Junior Member
Joined
Jan 25, 2012
Member Type
Student or Learner
Native Language
Italian
Home Country
Italy
Current Location
Italy
ok but how about the construction if the verb? when I can use "is (are) to be + past participle"?

and is it this kind of verb equal to "is beeing held"?
 

emsr2d2

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Jul 28, 2009
Member Type
English Teacher
Native Language
British English
Home Country
UK
Current Location
UK
For me "This meeting will be held on March 3rd" is the same is "This meeting is being held on March 3rd".
 

scrooge1974

Junior Member
Joined
Jan 25, 2012
Member Type
Student or Learner
Native Language
Italian
Home Country
Italy
Current Location
Italy
Thanks for the anwers Moderator and Riquecoh, you both are very polite[FONT=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]![/FONT]
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top