keen learner
Junior Member
- Joined
- Sep 1, 2010
- Member Type
- Other
- Native Language
- Hindi
- Home Country
- India
- Current Location
- India
What do we say?
He is British.
He is Britisher.
He is British.
He is Britisher.
Will I say "I met a British on a cruise."? or "a British person"? or "a British man"?:up: 'He is British' works fine. 'Britisher' is not only insulting, it is also a noun - so in less enlightened times some people said 'he is a Britisher', but as Tullia said this is offensive. (Like any noun it can be used with an adjectival function - so you could have 'a Briitsher '<noun>' (though it's not advisable to use it).
Another less offensive version is 'he's a Brit'; a lot af people dislike this.
b
Same here.... I never new "Britisher" is an offensive term.Schwein-hund.
I use "Brits" on occasion, but mean no offense. Would "Britons" be the preferred term?
Will I say "I met a British on a cruise."? or "a British person"? or "a British man"?
I've never heard of "Britisher."
Schwein-hund.
I use "Brits" on occasion, but mean no offense. Would "Britons" be the preferred term?
:up: Agreed, about the c, but as the writers didn't even trust their readers with 'Schweinhund'...I met a British person/man/woman/girl/guy etc on a cruise.
I met a Brit on a cruise (note that I don't consider "a Brit" to be offensive at all).
I too had never heard of "Britisher" so would not have considered it either correct or offensive. I can imagine it being in a German war comic but I would have expected it to be "Britische(r)" which would fit the German for the adjective "British".
He is British.
He is a British.
May I say both? If so, what's the difference.
Thank you for your time in advance!
Can someone explain why "Britisher" is offensive? I can't for the life of me make out why.