[Grammar] Why is this wrong?

Status
Not open for further replies.

jei oh

New member
Joined
Jun 18, 2013
Member Type
Student or Learner
Native Language
Korean
Home Country
South Korea
Current Location
South Korea
I took the grammar test and the question was "rewrite the given sentence with multilplicative expression"

"Given sentence"

- It is only 3mm long, but it can jump about 30 cm.

and my answer was

- it can jump about 100 times of its body size.

Correct answer by teacher

- it can jump about 100 times its body size. (without 'of')

I understand people uses the correct answer. However, I don't understand why I am wrong grammatically.

Can you help me understand?
 

emsr2d2

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Jul 28, 2009
Member Type
English Teacher
Native Language
British English
Home Country
UK
Current Location
UK
I took the grammar test and the question was "rewrite the given sentence with multilplicative expression"

"Given sentence"

- It is only 3mm long, but it can jump about 30 cm.

and my answer was

- it can jump about 100 times of its body size.

Correct answer by teacher

- it can jump about 100 times its body size. (without 'of')

I understand people uses the correct answer. However, I don't understand why I am wrong grammatically.

Can you help me understand?

Because we don't say "times of".

Nine is three times three.
A magic bottle can hold five times its own weight.
A flea can jump 150 times its own height.
 

jei oh

New member
Joined
Jun 18, 2013
Member Type
Student or Learner
Native Language
Korean
Home Country
South Korea
Current Location
South Korea
Because we don't say "times of".

Nine is three times three.
A magic bottle can hold five times its own weight.
A flea can jump 150 times its own height.

As I mentioned above I understand people don't say "times of" when used after direct object, however, the teacher's answer used 'about' which makes 'jump' intransitive verb.... so that we have to use adverb clause right? in that case, I thought I could use one adverb clause and adjective clause that modifies '100 times.'

'about 100 times of its size'

If I'm worng, can you make it clear? thanks
 
Last edited:

Tdol

No Longer With Us (RIP)
Staff member
Joined
Nov 13, 2002
Native Language
British English
Home Country
UK
Current Location
Japan
I'd use about 100 times its body length. There's no need to say of.
 

emsr2d2

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Jul 28, 2009
Member Type
English Teacher
Native Language
British English
Home Country
UK
Current Location
UK
As I mentioned above I understand people don't say "times of" when used after direct object, however, the teacher's answer used 'about' which makes 'jump' intransitive verb.... so that we have to use adverb clause right? in that case, I thought I could use one adverb clause and adjective clause that modifies '100 times.'

'about 100 times of its size'

If I'm worng, can you make it clear? thanks

About = approximately.

It can jump 100 times its own body length. (It can jump exactly 100 times ...)
It can jump about 100 times its own body length. (It can jump approximately that far)
 

MikeNewYork

VIP Member
Joined
Nov 13, 2002
Member Type
Academic
Native Language
American English
Home Country
United States
Current Location
United States
I'd use about 100 times its body length. There's no need to say of.

I was going to suggest body "length" also. We are not told how wide the thing is (probably a bug).
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top