Results 1 to 4 of 4
  1. Senior Member
    Student or Learner
    • Member Info
      • Native Language:
      • Italian
      • Home Country:
      • Italy
      • Current Location:
      • Italy

    • Join Date: Sep 2004
    • Posts: 596
    #1

    comparisons with no repetitions

    Hi, I'd like to know if the following sentence is correct:

    1) In Elizabethan theatres there weren't curtains or scenary , while in modern ones THERE ARE.

    Can I say THERE ARE at the end without repeating curtains or scenery?
    Are there any other mistakes?

    I have quite the same problem with this sentence:

    2) Modern theatres are covered, instead Elizabethan ones were not.

    Can I just say were not withouth repeating covered? Is the use of the comma before instead correct?

    Can I say :

    3) Elizabethan theatres were small, circular or octagonal, while nowadays they are of different size and form.

    Can I use the pronoun or should I say theatres?
    Is it correct to say "nowadays theatres are of different size and form"? Could I say

    4) Nowadays there are theatres of different size and form?

    Should I put size and form in the plural forms?

    Thank you.
    Rip.

  2. Mister Micawber's Avatar
    Key Member
    English Teacher
    • Member Info
      • Native Language:
      • English
      • Home Country:
      • United States
      • Current Location:
      • Japan

    • Join Date: Sep 2004
    • Posts: 1,857
    #2

    Re: comparisons with no repetitions

    #1 is fine, Rip. You needn't repeat.

    #2 is fine re repetition, but the comma produces a comma-splice sentence. Insert a conjunction, or change the comma to a semicolon (and add a comma after 'instead').

    #3 & 4 -- You needn't repeat 'theatres'. Both the singulars and plurals of 'size' and 'form' work, as they can be considered either countables or concepts. In #3, you need to repunctuate 'small, circular or octagonal' to avoid its reading as three different choices: 'small, and circular or octagonal'.

  3. Senior Member
    Student or Learner
    • Member Info
      • Native Language:
      • Italian
      • Home Country:
      • Italy
      • Current Location:
      • Italy

    • Join Date: Sep 2004
    • Posts: 596
    #3

    Re: comparisons with no repetitions

    Hi, I'm not sure I understand what you mean, when you say

    2 is fine re repetition,


    Do you mean it is to repeat the word cover, or you mean it is fine without repetition? Thanks Rip.

  4. Mister Micawber's Avatar
    Key Member
    English Teacher
    • Member Info
      • Native Language:
      • English
      • Home Country:
      • United States
      • Current Location:
      • Japan

    • Join Date: Sep 2004
    • Posts: 1,857
    #4

    Re: comparisons with no repetitions

    It is fine without repeating 'theatre' or 'covered'.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •