What's the difference between "shall" and "should"?

Status
Not open for further replies.

Ever Student

Senior Member
Joined
Aug 22, 2008
Member Type
Interested in Language
Native Language
Persian
Home Country
Iran
Current Location
Iran


Hello,

I do know that "Shall" is used for future and "Should" is the past form of that. However, looking up in my dictionary, I have been confused about the real differnce between "shall" and "should". Because they are used in the same way in given examples.

Would you please help me?

 

philo2009

Senior Member
Joined
Jan 16, 2009
Member Type
Academic
Native Language
British English
Home Country
UK
Current Location
Japan
Hello,

I do know that "Shall" is used for future and "Should" is the past form of that. However, looking up in my dictionary, I have been confused about the real differnce between "shall" and "should". Because they are used in the same way in given examples.

Would you please help me?

'Should' is etmologically the past tense of 'shall' but in practice does not function as an independent past tense: that is to say, a main clause predicated by 'should' has either present or future reference, but not past.

The formal connection between 'shall' and 'should' is evident only in the context of reported speech, so that e.g. the statement

"I shall be here at seven tomorrow."

could (in BrE, at least) be reported as

I told her that I should be there at seven the following day.

(AmE speakers, however - and indeed many contemporary BrE speakers -would prefer 'would' here.)

Within a main clause , 'should' functions both as a DEONTIC modal, with the meaning '(have) a duty to/(be) obliged to', as in

You should always handle antiques with care.

and as an EPISTEMIC modal, with the meaning 'can logically be expected to', as in

His train has just arrived; so he should be here somewhere.

I hope this contains at least some of the information that you require!
 

konungursvia

VIP Member
Joined
Mar 20, 2009
Member Type
Academic
Native Language
English
Home Country
Canada
Current Location
Canada
Should is primarily a conditional form of shall; only at times is it used as a sort of retrospective (past) for shall.
 

Ever Student

Senior Member
Joined
Aug 22, 2008
Member Type
Interested in Language
Native Language
Persian
Home Country
Iran
Current Location
Iran
Many thanks for your help Philo and Kon.
 

yiuho

Junior Member
Joined
Oct 28, 2009
Member Type
Student or Learner
Native Language
American English
Home Country
Afghanistan
Current Location
American Samoa
Hello,

I do know that "Shall" is used for future and "Should" is the past form of that. However, looking up in my dictionary, I have been confused about the real differnce between "shall" and "should". Because they are used in the same way in given examples.

Would you please help me?


From my understanding, "Shall" has same or similar meaning as "Will". In British English, most of the people would say "I shall go to school.", but in American English would say "I will go to school." Lesser people would use "Shall" now, because the past tense of "Shall" is "Shan't", "Shan't" is old style english, we just use "won't" (the past tense of "will") now. The meaning of "Should" is used to say what would have been right or sensible, but was not done.
 

konungursvia

VIP Member
Joined
Mar 20, 2009
Member Type
Academic
Native Language
English
Home Country
Canada
Current Location
Canada
Shan't and won't are not past tenses of shall and will.
 

yiuho

Junior Member
Joined
Oct 28, 2009
Member Type
Student or Learner
Native Language
American English
Home Country
Afghanistan
Current Location
American Samoa
Shan't and won't are not past tenses of shall and will.

haha! Sorry it's my fault....I just wanted to say the short form of "shall not" is "shan't" and "will not" is "won't".......so I understand "shall" is seldomly to be used except British English cos the modern english would use "will" to instead of "shall"....please correct me if I'm wrong.....Thanks.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top