Results 1 to 2 of 2

    • Join Date: Dec 2009
    • Posts: 1
    • Post Thanks / Like

    Unhappy none of

    i want a clear explanation of using none in language usage

    • Join Date: Nov 2009
    • Posts: 966
    • Post Thanks / Like

    Re: none of

    Quote Originally Posted by noorul123 View Post
    i want a clear explanation of using none in language usage
    Usage Note:
    It is widely asserted that none is equivalent to no one, and hence requires a singular verb and singular pronoun: None of the prisoners was given his soup. It is true that none is etymologically derived from the Old English word n, "one," but the word has been used as both a singular and a plural noun from Old English onward. The plural usage appears in the King James Bible as well as the works of John Dryden and Edmund Burke and is widespread in the works of respectable writers today. Of course, the singular usage is perfectly acceptable. The choice between a singular or plural verb depends on the desired effect. Both options are acceptable in this sentence: None of the conspirators has (or have) been brought to trial. When none is modified by almost, however, it is difficult to avoid treating the word as a plural: Almost none of the officials were (not was) interviewed by the committee. None can only be plural in its use in sentences such as None but his most loyal supporters believe (not believes) his story.

    none - Dictionary definition and pronunciation - Yahoo! Education


Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts