would (have) received

Status
Not open for further replies.

GUEST2008

Key Member
Joined
Feb 20, 2008
Member Type
Student or Learner
Native Language
German
Home Country
Germany
Current Location
Sweden
Hi

If the builders finished the work to schedule, they would receive a bonus.

--- Shouldn't it rather be: "... they would have received a bonus"?
 

sarat_106

Key Member
Joined
Mar 19, 2008
Member Type
English Teacher
Native Language
Oriya
Home Country
India
Current Location
India
Hi

If the builders finished the work to schedule, they would receive a bonus.

--- Shouldn't it rather be: "... they would have received a bonus"?

This is a second conditional where we use the past simple tense to talk about the future condition. We use WOULD + base verb to talk about the future result. There can be no 'have'
 

Tdol

No Longer With Us (RIP)
Staff member
Joined
Nov 13, 2002
Native Language
British English
Home Country
UK
Current Location
Japan
Also, I'd say 'on schedule' there.
 

euncu

Senior Member
Joined
Aug 22, 2009
Member Type
Other
Native Language
Turkish
Home Country
Turkey
Current Location
Turkey
Hi

If the builders finished the work to schedule, they would receive a bonus.

I guess there is something,whis is still wrong here. If you used the word "builder" instead of "a contractor" , why would a contractor get a bonus, it is already his/her commitment to fulfill. But it would sound natural to me if the workers employed by a contractor got their bonuses by making it to the deadline.
 

Raymott

VIP Member
Joined
Jun 29, 2008
Member Type
Academic
Native Language
English
Home Country
Australia
Current Location
Australia
Hi

If the builders finished the work to schedule, they would receive a bonus.

--- Shouldn't it rather be: "... they would have received a bonus"?
There are a few ways to say this depending on the meaning.
The second way is only possible if you amend the 'if' clause.

1. An habitual action in the past.
We had this arrangement. If the builders finished on schedule, they would receive a bonus. (Your first sentence).
2. After work completion, you, the boss, say to the foreman:
If the workers had finished on schedule, they would have received a bonus.

I can't think of an application for "If the builders finished the work to schedule, they would have received a bonus". If you can, what is the context?
 

Raymott

VIP Member
Joined
Jun 29, 2008
Member Type
Academic
Native Language
English
Home Country
Australia
Current Location
Australia
I guess there is something, which is still wrong here.
Hi encu. Your comma doesn't belong here.
You've written a non-defining clause - a 'which' clause with a comma. What you've written means "I guess there is something. And by the way, it is still wrong".
You mean "I guess there is something which is still wrong here."
 

euncu

Senior Member
Joined
Aug 22, 2009
Member Type
Other
Native Language
Turkish
Home Country
Turkey
Current Location
Turkey
Hi encu. Your comma doesn't belong here.
You've written a non-defining clause - a 'which' clause with a comma. What you've written means "I guess there is something. And by the way, it is still wrong".
You mean "I guess there is something which is still wrong here."

Thank you for correction, actually it would be ...there is still something wrong... at the beginning, but I couldn't have made up my mind on if it should have been ...is something wrong... or ...is something's wrong... .So, I changed the sentence to that form. I guess you say that I used which as the way that is used, so there shouldn't have been a comma there. My mistake was obviously following the habit to put a comma before which if it is a non-defining clause.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top