Should there be a comma before "for example"?
In some countries, Germany for example, all the...
Thanks.
***NOT A TEACHER***
Jasmin, good afternoon.
(1) I think that you need not use a comma because the phrase "for example" comes after your example ("Germany").
(a) Here's a sentence from Celce-Murcia and Larsen-Freeman's popular The Grammar Book: Intensive language programs, the University of Michigan's for example, require a great deal of time.
(2) If I understand my books correctly, a comma is needed if the example follows the phrase "for example." For example, "In some countries (for example, Germany), all the ...."/ "In some countries (e.g., Germany), all the...."
But there are instances when one would put a comma before "for example" even though the actual example precedes "for example." Here are a few examples:
States and public authorities have for the most part intervened to a limited extent in sport, instead leaving the organization and regulation of sport in the hands of sports federations. In the United Kingdom, for example, the executive and legislative have traditionally concerned themselves with sport only insofar as it has affected issues of public concern such as public health, public order and public safety.
The autonomy of sports authorities emanates from national law, as each state determines its extent. In Germany, for instance, where the state has not enacted a general law of sport...
As regards international sports governing bodies, they have the status of non-governmental organizations under international law, and most of them specify in their statutes the legal form under which they are incorporated. FIFA, for instance, declares itself an association within the meaning of Articles 60 ff. of the Swiss Civil Code.
In all the examples above the comma before "for example" indicates a (in my mind) needed pause. Would you agree?
Thanks.
But there are instances when one would put a comma before "for example" even though the actual example precedes "for example." Here are a few examples:
States and public authorities have for the most part intervened to a limited extent in sport, instead leaving the organization and regulation of sport in the hands of sports federations. In the United Kingdom, for example, the executive and legislative have traditionally concerned themselves with sport only insofar as it has affected issues of public concern such as public health, public order and public safety.
The autonomy of sports authorities emanates from national law, as each state determines its extent. In Germany, for instance, where the state has not enacted a general law of sport...
As regards international sports governing bodies, they have the status of non-governmental organizations under international law, and most of them specify in their statutes the legal form under which they are incorporated. FIFA, for instance, declares itself an association within the meaning of Articles 60 ff. of the Swiss Civil Code.
In all the examples above the comma before "for example" indicates a (in my mind) needed pause. Would you agree?
Thanks.