was/were + Verb-ing

Status
Not open for further replies.

Gregory.

Member
Joined
Mar 7, 2010
Member Type
Student or Learner
hi everybody,

I have a question, what is the difference between:

Carol R. Johnson, the schools superintendent, said staff members were not being fired, but were being asked to “recommit” themselves.

Carol R. Johnson, the schools superintendent, said staff members have not been fired, but have been asked to “recommit” themselves.

best regards

thanks
 

bhaisahab

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Apr 12, 2008
Member Type
Retired English Teacher
Native Language
British English
Home Country
England
Current Location
Ireland
hi everybody,

I have a question, what is the difference between:

Carol R. Johnson, the schools superintendent, said staff members were not being fired, but were being asked to “recommit” themselves.

Carol R. Johnson, the schools superintendent, said staff members have not been fired, but have been asked to “recommit” themselves.

best regards

thanks
The first one strongly indicates that the staff members are going to keep their jobs if they "recommit" themselves. The second says that up until now no one has been fired but they have been asked to "recommit" themselves, it doesn't indicate anything for the future.
 

Raymott

VIP Member
Joined
Jun 29, 2008
Member Type
Academic
Native Language
English
Home Country
Australia
Current Location
Australia
hi everybody,

I have a question, what is the difference between:

Carol R. Johnson, the schools superintendent, said staff members were not being fired, but were being asked to “recommit” themselves.

Carol R. Johnson, the schools superintendent, said staff members have not been fired, but have been asked to “recommit” themselves.

best regards

thanks
In the first, the process is still ongoing.
In the second, all staff have been spoken to.
 

euncu

Senior Member
Joined
Aug 22, 2009
Member Type
Other
Native Language
Turkish
Home Country
Turkey
Current Location
Turkey
In the second, all staff have been spoken to.

Shouldn't it be "had" instead of "have", since this is a reported speech sentence with past tense?
 

Raymott

VIP Member
Joined
Jun 29, 2008
Member Type
Academic
Native Language
English
Home Country
Australia
Current Location
Australia
Shouldn't it be "had" instead of "have", since this is a reported speech sentence with past tense?
Not necessarily.
If people are gathering around worrying about whether some staff have been fired, you can say: Carol R. Johnson, the schools superintendent, said staff members have not been fired.

A: Have the staff been fired.
B: No they haven't.
A: How do you know they haven't been?
B: Well, Carol said they haven't been fired.

You'd need another step back in the past to use 'had'.
You could easily make a context in which "had" was necessary though.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top