G
GuidanceHD
Guest
Given that this is for an Academic research paper, would you kindly mark out the better choice of the two provided in red (in literary or stylistic terms). Suggestions other than those mentioned here are most welcome.
(May I use “with ease” as a substitute for “in cold blood”? Are there other (literary) alternatives?)
Fragrant Regards,,,
GuidanceHD
- “Myrtle was killed in cold blood as Daisy and Tom have the money and power necessary to cover them up/ cover up for them”
- Gatsby is murdered "with ease" and (is) gone without the respectable funeral he deserved for “his hospitality” at least.
(May I use “with ease” as a substitute for “in cold blood”? Are there other (literary) alternatives?)
- Is it acceptable to say: she assumed the role of a lady full well, as analogous to: he knows full well?
- …characterized not only by moral laxity but also by lack of taste (Is it “more literary” to repeat by?)
- He was a friend of Daisy’s/Daisy?
- …regardless of who loves her better/more?
- …the incidents fire up even more until they are eventually extinguished with Gatsby shot dead/ being shot dead in his pool?
- The main symbol of the novel is Gatsby, and his greatness is the centre of (the?) dispute.
- On another occasion (are there other “literary” synonyms?)
- Any contempt the reader might feel/ have for Tom and Daisy is offset by the sorrow he feels for Gatsby and his thwarted love story.
- Is it correct to say: he did not even feel a little sorrow for him?
Fragrant Regards,,,
GuidanceHD