Interested in Language
Is it correct to say "It is unfair (that) citizens not be able to afford..."?
In other words can we use the subjunctive like we do with the expression "it's essential"?
Thank you in advance!
I see.But what about the verb form after the expression "it's unfair". Shouldn't we put a bare infinitive like in the sentence "It's essential that he go to the doctor."
And another thing...Can't we omit "that" in the subjunctive after the verbs "suggest","propose","recommend" etc.?
We go home. -- Is go a bare infinitive here? I hope you say: no. Looks like one but it is not.
Yes,you've got a point.However,grammar books (in the chapter of the subordinate) say that the syntax is:suggest,propose,recommend,it's vital etc.+(that)+noun+bare infinitive.
"It's important that you be there."
I insist/.suggest/recommend that he (should) go there alone"
Besides after should we always use bare infinitive and I know it's used more frequently in British English.
So why not say "it's unfair that citizens not be able to afford..." since we can say "The boss insisted that she not be at the meeting."
I'm a little bit confused...
Your confusion is understandable, and the writer of any grammar book who calls 'go' in a sentence such as
It is vital that she go to bed early.
a 'bare infinitive' ought to be shot!
'Go' is here, as a previous contributor has commented, a form of the subjunctive mood, NOT an infinitive of any kind (bare or otherwise).
However, to return to your original question: in contrast with expressions such as 'It is vital/essential/important that...', the subjunctive after 'It is unfair that...' is, I would say - while not inconceivable - relatively uncommon. Either the indicative or the should-form would be the normal constructions, the former where the event or condition referred to is openly admitted as a fact, and the latter where it is simply conceived of as a possibility.
It is unfair that nonresidents are not allowed to vote.
(that they cannot do so is an undisputed fact).
It is unfair that Peter should be paid more than Paul for doing the same job.
(more likely in a situation where this is not actually happening, but merely a proposal or theoretical possibility).
Thanks a lot!!!