[General] "Kids are a full time job."

Status
Not open for further replies.

infiniteone

Member
Joined
Nov 13, 2009
Member Type
Student or Learner
Native Language
Korean
Home Country
South Korea
Current Location
South Korea
I have diffiiculty understanding the meaning of the following sentence.
This sentence comes from an article about adopting kids.

Kids are a full time job.


Is that means that parenting kids are a full time job?
If it means that, Is that sentence is grammartic or well-formed ?

How about the downer sentence ?

Kids are full time jobs.
 

TheParser

VIP Member
Joined
Dec 8, 2009
Member Type
Other
Native Language
English
Home Country
United States
Current Location
United States
I have diffiiculty understanding the meaning of the following sentence.
This sentence comes from an article about adopting kids.

Kids are a full time job.


Is that means that parenting kids are a full time job?
If it means that, Is that sentence is grammartic or well-formed ?

How about the downer sentence ?

Kids are full time jobs.


***** NOT A TEACHER *****

Good morning, infiniteone.

(1) Yes, I believe that "Kids are a full-time job" is correct.

(2) Perhaps "Parenting is a full-time job" would be a little more accurate.

(3) I believe that your last sentence should not be used.

Have a nice day!
 

infiniteone

Member
Joined
Nov 13, 2009
Member Type
Student or Learner
Native Language
Korean
Home Country
South Korea
Current Location
South Korea
What's a downer sentence? Do you mean "How about the sentence below?"

yes. I meant it.
Thank you for correcting it.

So... How about the sentence below?

Kids are full time jobs.
 

Raymott

VIP Member
Joined
Jun 29, 2008
Member Type
Academic
Native Language
English
Home Country
Australia
Current Location
Australia
yes. I meant it.
Thank you for correcting it.

So... How about the sentence below?

Kids are full time jobs.
No, each kid isn't a job. Any number of kids from one upwards is a full-time job.
 

infiniteone

Member
Joined
Nov 13, 2009
Member Type
Student or Learner
Native Language
Korean
Home Country
South Korea
Current Location
South Korea
No, each kid isn't a job. Any number of kids from one upwards is a full-time job.

Thank you for replying me.

The thing I am curious about is in sentence A, how the plural form of the subject and verb(kids, are) takes the singular form of the noun as a complement (a full time job).

I thought that was not grammatical like sentence B.

A: Kids are a full time job.


B: Apples are a tasty fruit.
 

TheParser

VIP Member
Joined
Dec 8, 2009
Member Type
Other
Native Language
English
Home Country
United States
Current Location
United States
Thank you for replying me.

The thing I am curious about is in sentence A, how the plural form of the subject and verb(kids, are) takes the singular form of the noun as a complement (a full time job).

I thought that was not grammatical like sentence B.

A: Kids are a full time job.


B: Apples are a tasty fruit.


***** NOT A TEACHER *****

Good afternoon, infiniteone.

(1) Do I understand your comment correctly?

Are you saying that "Apples are a tasty fruit" is UNgrammatical?

If you are, may I very respectfully suggest that it is, in fact, very "correct."

(2) Unfortunately, I cannot explain the reason.

(3) Maybe (only maybe) the reason is that we are talking about the different kinds of fruits:

TEACHER: Can you name some tasty fruits?

STUDENT 1: Apples are a tasty fruit.

STUDENT 2: Bananas are also a tasty fruit.

STUDENT 3: And don't forget cherries. They are another tasty fruit.

(4) Hopefully, some teacher or non-teacher will explain the "rule" to you and me.

Have a nice day!
 

Raymott

VIP Member
Joined
Jun 29, 2008
Member Type
Academic
Native Language
English
Home Country
Australia
Current Location
Australia
Thank you for replying me.

The thing I am curious about is in sentence A, how the plural form of the subject and verb(kids, are) takes the singular form of the noun as a complement (a full time job).

I thought that was not grammatical like sentence B.

A: Kids are a full time job.


B: Apples are a tasty fruit.
There is varying tolerance towards a sentence like this. It's not wrong though.
Here, "apples" doesn't refer to more than one apple. It refers to one species, Malus domestica.
Some people would prefer to reword a sentence like this to: "The apple is a tasty fruit." That fixes the grammar problem, but it introduces a new potential complication since, in this case, "the apple" doesn't refer to a specific apple.
 

TheParser

VIP Member
Joined
Dec 8, 2009
Member Type
Other
Native Language
English
Home Country
United States
Current Location
United States
Thank you for replying me.

The thing I am curious about is in sentence A, how the plural form of the subject and verb(kids, are) takes the singular form of the noun as a complement (a full time job).

I thought that was not grammatical like sentence B.

A: Kids are a full time job.


B: Apples are a tasty fruit.

***** NOT A TEACHER *****

Good morning, infiniteone.

(1) Thank you for asking such a difficult question. I think I may have found some helpful information.

(2) Yes, you are correct about the rule:

singular noun (or phrase) + IS + singular noun.

Plural noun + ARE + plural noun.

(3) As you know, probably every language has EXCEPTIONS.

(4) You wish to talk about a plural noun (apples) and a singular noun (fruit).

(a) The "rule" is usually this: the verb agrees with the FIRST noun:

(i) Apples + ARE (because "apples" is plural) + a tasty fruit.

(ii) A tasty fruit + IS (because "fruit" is singular) + apples.

(P. S. You may also say: The apple is a tasty fruit; A tasty fruit is the apple.)

*****

(5) Your sentence "Kids are a full-time job" is a little more difficult.

(a) "Are" because "kids" is plural.

(b) But probably you may NOT say: "A full-time job is kids."

(c) In your "apples" sentence, you were identifying something. So you could say "Apples are...." or "A tasty fruit is..."

(d) If I understand my book correctly, your "kids" sentence is not identifying anything. It is describing something -- as an ADJECTIVE does.

(e) When you say "full-time job," I think that you mean it takes all of your time.

(i) Well,then, your sentence almost equals "Kids are time-consuming." As you can see, "time-consuming" is an adjective.

(a) The book I am using has two such examples:

The younger children are a problem.
Dogs are good company.

"Are a problem" and "good company" LOOK like nouns, but the MEANING is clearly ADJECTIVAL. (And, as you know, an IS/ARE sentence with adjectives does not have to be "balanced": He IS nice; They ARE nice.)

Thank you for your great question. I learned so much.

*****

If you want to read about this yourself, see A COMPREHENSIVE GRAMMAR OF THE ENGLISH LANGUAGE, by Randolph Quirk , Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech, and Jan Svartvik. I have the 1985 edition. There may be a newer edition. Look for "subject-verb concord."
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top