Results 1 to 4 of 4
  1. #1
    magdalena is offline Member
    • Member Info
      • Member Type:
      • English Teacher
      • Native Language:
      • Polish
      • Home Country:
      • Poland
      • Current Location:
      • Poland
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    327

    you are doing stupidly- why incorrect?

    One of my students asked me why we can't say in English "you are doing stupidly", I know that we can say you are acting stupidly (generally) or you are doing IT stupidly and I told him that doing requires an object is this explanation correct?

  2. #2
    mayita1usa's Avatar
    mayita1usa is offline Member
    • Member Info
      • Member Type:
      • English Teacher
      • Native Language:
      • American English
      • Home Country:
      • United States
      • Current Location:
      • United States
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    227

    Re: you are doing stupidly- why incorrect?

    Yes!

  3. #3
    Barb_D's Avatar
    Barb_D is offline Moderator
    • Member Info
      • Member Type:
      • Other
      • Native Language:
      • American English
      • Home Country:
      • United States
      • Current Location:
      • United States
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    19,049

    Re: you are doing stupidly- why incorrect?

    No, that doesn't work. It doesn't need an object to still work in these sentence:

    You're doing well.
    He's doing poorly.
    I'm doing okay.

    But I don't have a better explanation.
    I'm not a teacher, but I write for a living. Please don't ask me about 2nd conditionals, but I'm a safe bet for what reads well in (American) English.

  4. #4
    philo2009 is offline Key Member
    • Member Info
      • Member Type:
      • Academic
      • Native Language:
      • British English
      • Home Country:
      • UK
      • Current Location:
      • Japan
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    1,482

    Re: you are doing stupidly- why incorrect?

    As Barb D points out, the verb 'do' can be intransitive, but essentially only when complemented by an adverb semantically equivalent to 'well' or 'badly', or to some degree of those, explaining both do poorly ('poorly' here is synonymous with 'badly') and informal do OK ('OK' here = fairly well), as well as do fantastically and do abysmally (respectively, 'extremely well' and 'extremely badly'), while excluding many others, such as *do stupidly ('stupidly', despite its negative connotations, does not actually mean 'badly') or *do happily (despite positive connotations, 'happily' does not mean 'well').

    It is interesting to note, however, that some apparently disallowed collocations, such as informal BrE do uselessly, would be considered acceptable in contexts where the quality of a person's performance, e.g. in a sporting event, was being assessed (i.e. in this case, uselessly = badly).

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •