Results 1 to 2 of 2
  1. #1
    LQZ is offline Member
    • Member Info
      • Member Type:
      • Other
      • Native Language:
      • Chinese
      • Home Country:
      • China
      • Current Location:
      • China
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    188

    more than (was) reported

    1 There were more casualties than was reported.
    2 There were more casualties than reported.

    Dear teacher,

    Are both 1 and 2 grammartically correct? If yes, could you explain to me why "was" can be omitted? and there is any rule I can comply with? Thanks.


    LQZ

  2. #2
    TheParser is offline VIP Member
    • Member Info
      • Member Type:
      • Other
      • Native Language:
      • English
      • Home Country:
      • United States
      • Current Location:
      • United States
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    6,741

    Re: more than (was) reported

    Quote Originally Posted by LQZ View Post
    1 There were more casualties than was reported.
    2 There were more casualties than reported.

    Dear teacher,

    Are both 1 and 2 grammartically correct? If yes, could you explain to me why "was" can be omitted? and there is any rule I can comply with? Thanks.


    LQZ
    ***** NOT A TEACHER *****

    Good morning, LQZ.

    (1) As I type, no one else has answered.

    (2) If I start, maybe one of the teachers will answer us.

    (3) I am about 75% sure that your sentence should read:

    There were more casualties than WERE reported.

    (a) I say this because maybe (maybe) your sentence means something

    like:

    More casualties occurred than the casualties that WERE actually reported.

    (i) As you can see, "were" is necessary in order to agree with "casualties."

    (4) I love rules, too. Sadly, I could not find a good, clear, definite rule.

    The books just say that sometimes we can delete the subject or verb if

    the sentence is "clear."

    (a) So that learners are not confused, it would probably be better NOT

    to delete "were."

    (5) By the way, if (a big "IF") I read my books correctly, there is NO

    missing subject in your sentence. That is, it is not considered "correct"

    nowadays to say:

    There were more casualties than WHAT were reported.

    Have a nice day!

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •