I note you've sent your outline directly or indirectly to several world leaders including the King of England. Have you received much encouraging feedback yet?Hope you help spread this message, I hope the world's news media coverage of this information.
I can’t see it happening. What have you done so far that’s newsworthy?
Here, International Language Organization of basic information:
1, International Language Organization's Mission: to promote the language development of science throughout the world to promote the progress of the language of all mankind.
Do you mean promote linguistics (the science of language?). “Promoting the language development of science” is meaningless. This defect of apparent meaninglessness pervades your whole message.
2, International Language Organization's main tasks: (a), bringing together the power of every country around the world, bringing together academics and language for each language the power of institutions to carry out linguistic research;
Linguists already have international conferences, and communicate though scholarly journals.
What further are you offering?
(b), the creation of the language of most scientific theories;
Scientific theories don’t need a specific language. It’s hard to imagine what such a language would be.
( c) to promote the progress of the language evolution of all mankind;
This happens spontaneously. It always has. Evolution of language needs no promotion.
(d), to solve the problem of international communication language barrier:
OK, now you’re talking! How do you propose to do this?
The language barrier is the international communication major problems of mankind, all humanity should work together to resolve this important issue. International Language Organization brings together linguists around the world,
Do you mean you have already started this Organisation and have made some progress?
learn the advantages of the various languages around the world, the creation of the most scientific, most easy to learn, the most simple language, as the common language of international communication, language barriers of humanity the problem is resolved
OK, well Spanish is probably the easiest language for most people to learn. [Let’s sayit is, just for argument] You want to make this a common language? This sort of thing has been tried before. Also “simple” artifical languages have been developed – Esperanto being the most famous; and it’s gone almost nowhere.
The common language is very easy to promote, A, the more common language with any language, has great advantages, the common language level and easy to learn the perfect degree of surprise, people feel wonderful, it is very interested in the average person, just one month's easy to learn,
One month to learn. OK, then it’s not Spanish or any extant language. It’s not a language I could imagine. The average person has enough trouble making themself understood in their native language after using it for 20 years.
you can everyday conversation, the universal language in itself can produce a huge spread of power;
Perhaps you’re talking about telepathy?
B, International Language Organization has tremendous outreach capacity, can do The most effective outreach.
No more than anyone on the internet.
About 5 years to promote this common language will be popular in the international exchanges, international exchanges of the language barrier to solve the problem.
Esperanto has had about 120 years of promotion.
About promotion of 10 years, this common language can become the second national language in the world, you can see the common language, since then, people around the world do not need to learn the specialized language, each person born on in life to see the mother tongue and the universal language (second language), only in childhood, in life and understand, the same as learning the mother tongue, grasp the common language.
It takes longer than 10 years for a pidgin language to become a creole – which is the type of thing you’re proposing. And this only happens where there is real community need for it – a survival need, not just someone’s idea of a need relating to a global benefit.
The future of mankind language situation is that, in international exchanges in the world to use this common language, do not learn the language; the country's internal, use their own national language. With this common language, can increase understanding between countries, communication, friendship, peace and more security, the development of a more hopeful life better.
Sure, but it’s a dream. Maybe a good and worthy dream. But is there any evidence at all of a prospect of turning this into reality? What does your research say about this? And who is going to police it – make people use it, issue penalties for non-compliance with the ILO’s dream. Is the ILO only going to exist in totalitarian countries where it’s objectives can be forcibly imposed on the people?
3, International Language Organization of organization: implementation of national membership, any country around the world has the right and obligation to become a member. International Language Organization to invite the world to all linguists, language enthusiasts, language groups, to participate in language studies.
You have the right to invite countries to become a member, but no country has any obligation unless you can enforce this rule.
5, International Language Organization's main features: between the national organization, the forces of Member States to maintain the organization,
I’m really getting a bad feeling about this!
for the world to participate in the organization that specializes in promoting language and progress of activities, not engage in other activities.
7, The emergence of a world state to the International Language Organization to provide shelter, marking the successful International Language Organization was founded.
So you are proposing a linguocracy? A sovereign state based on a common world language that provides “shelter”? To whom? Other ILO-speaking individuals?
International Language Organization founder GaiGaiLun
Student or Learner