will vs would

Status
Not open for further replies.

Mr. X

Junior Member
Joined
Jun 24, 2010
Member Type
Student or Learner
Native Language
Nepali
Home Country
Pakistan
Current Location
India
Hi,

I am trying to understand the difference between the two. For example: Let's say I sign the deal. Will you be angry? (here, I believe will is right because there is speculation over the future).

Otherwise, if we use would in a question, it refers to the immediate present. In other words, will=future, would=present. Is that right?

Mr. X
 

Mr. X

Junior Member
Joined
Jun 24, 2010
Member Type
Student or Learner
Native Language
Nepali
Home Country
Pakistan
Current Location
India
'Let's say I sign the deal. Will you be angry?' correct.

When you bring the conditional in, use would:

'If I were to sign the deal, would you be angry?'

In both cases, we're talking about the future.

Rover

Thanks, Rover, but can would be used even without the conditional? For instance: I am going to ask a few questions. Would that be okay with you? (I am assuming 'would' rather than 'will' is right here because it keeps things in the immediate present).

Also in statements, we say: I suppose that would be fine. Isn't this a polite way to saying: I suppose that is fine (rather than I suppose that will be fine). Doesn't would be simply replace is rather than act as the past of will?
 

SoothingDave

VIP Member
Joined
Apr 17, 2009
Member Type
Interested in Language
Native Language
American English
Home Country
United States
Current Location
United States
Not a teacher.

"Would" is conditional.
 

Mr. X

Junior Member
Joined
Jun 24, 2010
Member Type
Student or Learner
Native Language
Nepali
Home Country
Pakistan
Current Location
India
Not a teacher.

"Would" is conditional.

I am not sure that's always the case. 'That is fine' is simple present. 'That would be fine' is also present tense but it is a more formal way of putting it. Would doesn't make it conditional here.
 

TheParser

VIP Member
Joined
Dec 8, 2009
Member Type
Other
Native Language
English
Home Country
United States
Current Location
United States
I am not sure that's always the case. 'That is fine' is simple present. 'That would be fine' is also present tense but it is a more formal way of putting it. Would doesn't make it conditional here.

********** NOT A TEACHER **********

Hello, Mr. X.

(1) I found your question and the posters' answers most

interesting and helpful.

(2) May I suggest that we can all agree to call would a modal?

(Then we need not debate the word conditional.)

(3) I found something in Mr. L. G. Alexander's highly respected

Longman English Grammar that might (!) apply to your question:

We often use would in place of the simple present tense when we

want to sound less definite.

Therefore, MAYBE (!!!) we can analyze your examples this way:

(Two people are speaking) "I am going to bring the contract to your

office on Friday. That is fine." = definite.

"I am going to bring the contract to your office on Friday. That would

be fine." = less definite.

Thank you
 

bhaisahab

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Apr 12, 2008
Member Type
Retired English Teacher
Native Language
British English
Home Country
England
Current Location
Ireland
"Would" can also be used to talk about past habits, in the same way that we use "used to". "When I lived by the sea, I would swim every morning." For example.
 

Tdol

No Longer With Us (RIP)
Staff member
Joined
Nov 13, 2002
Native Language
British English
Home Country
UK
Current Location
Japan
Would can be used to add a degree of politeness as well as making something less definite.
 

Atchan

Key Member
Joined
Apr 30, 2010
Member Type
Student or Learner
Native Language
Somali
Home Country
Somalia
Current Location
Saudi Arabia
"Would" can also be used to talk about past habits, in the same way that we use "used to". "When I lived by the sea, I would swim every morning." For example.
"Would" really confused me, what I know about it is that it can be used in past habits but can it be used in present and future habits?

Do these sentences have a difference.
Past: If peter went to America I would go with him.
Future: If peter go to America I would go with him.
 

bhaisahab

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Apr 12, 2008
Member Type
Retired English Teacher
Native Language
British English
Home Country
England
Current Location
Ireland
"Would" really confused me, what I know about it is that it can be used in past habits but can it be used in present and future habits?

Do these sentences have a difference.
Past: If peter went to America, I would go with him.
Future: If peter go to America I would go with him.
Past: If Peter went to America, I would go with him. This is not past tense, it's conditional. We don't know if Peter will go to America, but if he does, "I" will go with him.
Which leads us neatly to your next example:
Future: If Peter goes to America, I will go with him.
 

euncu

Senior Member
Joined
Aug 22, 2009
Member Type
Other
Native Language
Turkish
Home Country
Turkey
Current Location
Turkey
Atchan, would you check this link please?;

Would

It helps me at times I get the similar confusion how to use "would". All different usages of would are here in an orderly fashion.
 

birdeen's call

VIP Member
Joined
Jul 15, 2010
Member Type
Student or Learner
Native Language
Polish
Home Country
Poland
Current Location
Poland
"Would" can also be used to talk about past habits, in the same way that we use "used to". "When I lived by the sea, I would swim every morning." For example.
And "will" can serve the same purpose when it comes to the present, can't it?
 

birdeen's call

VIP Member
Joined
Jul 15, 2010
Member Type
Student or Learner
Native Language
Polish
Home Country
Poland
Current Location
Poland
This isn't true. "Will" can be used for present habits.

He will always come to me asking for money. That's irritating!
 

Mr. X

Junior Member
Joined
Jun 24, 2010
Member Type
Student or Learner
Native Language
Nepali
Home Country
Pakistan
Current Location
India
This isn't true. "Will" can be used for present habits.

He will always come to me asking for money. That's irritating!

That should be: he would always come...
 

birdeen's call

VIP Member
Joined
Jul 15, 2010
Member Type
Student or Learner
Native Language
Polish
Home Country
Poland
Current Location
Poland

joelsensei

Member
Joined
Jul 4, 2010
Member Type
English Teacher
********** NOT A TEACHER **********

Hello, Mr. X.

(1) I found your question and the posters' answers most

interesting and helpful.

(2) May I suggest that we can all agree to call would a modal?

(Then we need not debate the word conditional.)

(3) I found something in Mr. L. G. Alexander's highly respected

Longman English Grammar that might (!) apply to your question:

We often use would in place of the simple present tense when we

want to sound less definite.

Therefore, MAYBE (!!!) we can analyze your examples this way:

(Two people are speaking) "I am going to bring the contract to your

office on Friday. That is fine." = definite.

"I am going to bring the contract to your office on Friday. That would

be fine." = less definite.

Thank you

I disagree somewhat with Parser's example, but only in part. The original question asked the difference between will/would in the question, "Will/Would you be angry?." The use of modal "will" is being used with epistemic modality, which is the likeliness of a conclusion based on the speaker's deductions. Parser's sentence "That would be fine" has little to do with likeliness of a conclusion but of the speaker's requirements or approval, root modality.

The correct explanation, I believe, is the epistemic interpretation where present and past tenses of "will" express distance from reality. In other words,

1) "Will you be angry?" expresses a future state where the speaker is more direct in his question and expecting a clear and precise answer.

2) "Would you be angry?" expresses a hypothetical state where the speaker is asking without committing him/herself to the situation.

EXAMPLE

Will you take courses in linguistics (this semester) ?
Would you (ever) take courses in linguistics (if you went to college)?

This is from Yule's "Explaining English Grammar"

I hope this helps.
 

Mr. X

Junior Member
Joined
Jun 24, 2010
Member Type
Student or Learner
Native Language
Nepali
Home Country
Pakistan
Current Location
India
Would you (ever) take courses in linguistics (if you went to college)?

This is from Yule's "Explaining English Grammar"

I hope this helps.

Thanks, it does help. Suppose the conversation continues (in the hypothetical), do we keep it to would and avoid will. For instance: Would you take the course...?
"Of course, I would (instead of I will). Why would you ask?"
"Because I am not sure how you would (instead of will) manage."

And so on and so on. So as long as they're keeping it to the hypothetical, we stick with would, right?

EDIT: Also this one. "If you don't want that to happen, it would be in your best interests to change." Would seems right here.

Mr. X
 
Last edited:

Tdol

No Longer With Us (RIP)
Staff member
Joined
Nov 13, 2002
Native Language
British English
Home Country
UK
Current Location
Japan
That should be: he would always come...

I disagree- Birdeen's Call is right to use will there; it's a current habit that is annoying the speaker and not a past one.
 

bhaisahab

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Apr 12, 2008
Member Type
Retired English Teacher
Native Language
British English
Home Country
England
Current Location
Ireland
And "will" can serve the same purpose when it comes to the present, can't it?
Yes, it can.
"He will always come to me asking for money. That's irritating!" This is correct.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top