Results 1 to 4 of 4
    • Member Info
      • Native Language:
      • Nepali
      • Home Country:
      • Pakistan
      • Current Location:
      • India

    • Join Date: Jun 2010
    • Posts: 81
    #1

    would instead of did not

    Hello,

    I am wondering whether would can be used in place of did not in past narrative.
    For example: They would admit neither X nor Y. He tried to make her understand, but she would not listen.

    In both cases, simple past can be used without would such as: they admitted neither x nor y or she did not listen. But I am wondering whether 'would' can be used in this way.

    Edit:

    Another question on would in past narrative: X was perhaps the event which would trigger world war. (is would here the same as 'was to'?).

    Mr. X
    Last edited by Mr. X; 15-Jul-2010 at 17:24.

  1. bhaisahab's Avatar
    • Member Info
      • Native Language:
      • British English
      • Home Country:
      • England
      • Current Location:
      • Ireland

    • Join Date: Apr 2008
    • Posts: 25,590
    #2

    Re: would instead of did not

    Quote Originally Posted by Mr. X View Post
    Hello,

    I am wondering whether would can be used in place of did not in past narrative.
    For example: They would admit neither X nor Y. He tried to make her understand, but she would not listen.

    In both cases, simple past can be used without would such as: they admitted neither x nor y or she did not listen. But I am wondering whether 'would' can be used in this way.

    Edit:

    Another question on would in past narrative: X was perhaps the event which would trigger world war. (is would here the same as 'was to'?).

    Mr. X
    Yes, all your examples are fine, "would" is used correctly. However, in this example it implies a refusal to listen that is not necessarily implied with "did not": "He tried to make her understand, but she would not listen".

    • Member Info
      • Native Language:
      • Nepali
      • Home Country:
      • Pakistan
      • Current Location:
      • India

    • Join Date: Jun 2010
    • Posts: 81
    #3

    Re: would instead of did not

    Quote Originally Posted by bhaisahab View Post
    Yes, all your examples are fine, "would" is used correctly. However, in this example it implies a refusal to listen that is not necessarily implied with "did not": "He tried to make her understand, but she would not listen".
    Thanks for pointing that out.

    What about the first example - would admit neither... does would here merely function as the past of will?

  2. Barb_D's Avatar
    • Member Info
      • Native Language:
      • American English
      • Home Country:
      • United States
      • Current Location:
      • United States

    • Join Date: Mar 2007
    • Posts: 19,215
    #4

    Re: would instead of did not

    It's also a refusal.
    I'm not a teacher, but I write for a living. Please don't ask me about 2nd conditionals, but I'm a safe bet for what reads well in (American) English.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •