Results 1 to 5 of 5
  1. #1
    sonyet is offline Junior Member
    • Member Info
      • Member Type:
      • Student or Learner
      • Native Language:
      • Italian
      • Home Country:
      • Italy
      • Current Location:
      • Italy
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    51

    third-party ink

    Dear all,
    I can't catch the meaning of *third-party ink* in the following sentence:
    Prior to the web, organizations had only two significant choices to attract attention: Buy expensive advertising or get third-party ink from the media.

    Is there anyone who can kindly help me? What does exactly mean? Why *third-party*? Thanks a lot in advance.
    s

  2. #2
    Rover_KE is online now Moderator
    • Member Info
      • Member Type:
      • Retired English Teacher
      • Native Language:
      • English
      • Home Country:
      • England
      • Current Location:
      • England
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Posts
    31,864

    Re: third-party ink

    They had to rely on the media to give them free publicity.

    The first party is the organisation, the second is the public and the third party is the newspaper or magazine writing about it.

    Rover

  3. #3
    BobK's Avatar
    BobK is offline Harmless drudge
    • Member Info
      • Member Type:
      • English Teacher
      • Native Language:
      • English
      • Home Country:
      • UK
      • Current Location:
      • UK
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    15,916

    Re: third-party ink

    Specifically, 'ink' meant printed coverage (in, as you say, newspapers and magazines) - in those pre-web days. Coverage in, say, a TV news report wouldn't be 'third-party* ink'.

    b

    *PS The reason for specifying 'third-party' is that if they bought 'expensive publicity' the 'ink' would be theirs (although someone else paid the ink supplier - ultimately, the advertising fee would cover it).
    Last edited by BobK; 19-Jul-2010 at 12:01. Reason: Added PS

  4. #4
    sonyet is offline Junior Member
    • Member Info
      • Member Type:
      • Student or Learner
      • Native Language:
      • Italian
      • Home Country:
      • Italy
      • Current Location:
      • Italy
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    51

    Re: third-party ink

    Quote Originally Posted by BobK View Post

    *PS The reason for specifying 'third-party' is that if they bought 'expensive publicity' the 'ink' would be theirs (although someone else paid the ink supplier - ultimately, the advertising fee would cover it).
    Therefore can the third party be a subject different from the newspaper or the company? I mean... A company makes the advertising on a newspaper but its marketing department finds someone else who pays for it...
    That seems the meaning of the sentence if I literally translate it in Italian (third party = conto terzi)...

  5. #5
    SoothingDave is offline VIP Member
    • Member Info
      • Member Type:
      • Interested in Language
      • Native Language:
      • American English
      • Home Country:
      • United States
      • Current Location:
      • United States
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    13,531

    Re: third-party ink

    Not a teacher.

    They mean by "third-party" someone else. In this case, a newspaper.

    The point is that promotion was accomplished by either buying advertizing, or getting someone in the media to cover you.

    It's basically saying you either paid for it yourself or convinced someone else to cover you for free.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •